VR3 -Bulhmann Vs VPM

Simon Ciantar · 20th January 2006, 12:57

Hi all,

I was wondering whether anyone out there could give me some concrete examples of how different would a profile using a VR3 with bulhmann tables as opposed to VR3 with VPM -B model would be . .

What im interested in mostly are dive profiles in the 65- to 80 mtr range with bottom times of 30 to 40 mins

Simon

**Steve** · 21st January 2006, 00:38

In my experience the profiles from the VPM algorithm are far more gradual. I like it so far. The run times were not apreciably different .

20th January 2006, 12:57	#1 (permalink)
Simon Ciantar New Member Current Rebreather/s: Inspiration Classic Other Rebreather/s: Join Date: May 2005 Location: Malta Posts: 38	VR3 -Bulhmann Vs VPM Hi all, I was wondering whether anyone out there could give me some concrete examples of how different would a profile using a VR3 with bulhmann tables as opposed to VR3 with VPM -B model would be . . What im interested in mostly are dive profiles in the 65- to 80 mtr range with bottom times of 30 to 40 mins Simon
(Offline)

21st January 2006, 00:38	#2 (permalink)
Steve Ladies bring a plate Current Rebreather/s: Megalodon Home Build Other Rebreather/s: Not Bought Yet Inspiration Classic Sport Kiss Classic Kiss MK 15.X Home Build Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Perth - Australia Posts: 1,117	Re: VR3 -Bulhmann Vs VPM In my experience the profiles from the VPM algorithm are far more gradual. I like it so far. The run times were not apreciably different . __________________ WARNING: I contain occasional coarse language, extreme sexual references, nudity, and adult themes, which may offend some people - Usually churchy types.
(Offline)

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode