| |
![]() | |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| S21 M.I.B. ![]() ![]() Current Rebreather/s: | Favorite Sorb Hi, A recent thread from Andy Mumford made me thinking about a poll regarding the most favorite sorb for rebreather divers. It's not only a matter of brand but also the reasons of this choice: is it the price, the availability, the efficiency, the convenience, the recommendation of the manufacturer/instructor, etc? I personaly use Sofnolime 797 rather than anything else as I found it to be the most efficient sorb on the market (it's a personal opinion). Nevertheless when I travel, I sometimes use Spherasorb as it's cheaper and more readily available. But I can't get the same time out of it. Cheers
__________________ Cedric Verdier PADI Course Director, ANDI-IANTD-PSAI-TDI-DSAT-DAN-NAUI-CMAS Instructor Trainer Trimix (CCR and OC) and Cave Diving Instructor Trainer www.CedricVerdier.com DIRrebreather member |
| (Offline) | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| RebreatherWorld Sponsor ![]() Current Rebreather/s: Inspiration Classic Classic Kiss Other CCR Other Rebreather/s: Inspiration Classic Inspiration Vision Evolution Megalodon Optima Other CCR Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Costa del Sol, Spain
Posts: 212
![]() | Quote: (Originally Posted by cedricverdier) Hi, I am going to try and get Intersurgical to provide us with some test data, as far as duration 99.9% of my dives are well within safe limits so it has never been an issue that the duration is slightly lower than 797 the benefits far outweigh that extra 10% of scrubber duration.A recent thread from Andy Mumford made me thinking about a poll regarding the most favorite sorb for rebreather divers. It's not only a matter of brand but also the reasons of this choice: is it the price, the availability, the efficiency, the convenience, the recommendation of the manufacturer/instructor, etc? I personaly use Sofnolime 797 rather than anything else as I found it to be the most efficient sorb on the market (it's a personal opinion). Nevertheless when I travel, I sometimes use Spherasorb as it's cheaper and more readily available. But I can't get the same time out of it. Cheers Cheers, Chris
__________________ Cheers, Chris www.tech-blue.com The site dedicated to Rebreather and Technical diving "We only sell what we dive" |
| (Offline) | |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Apprentice Luddite ![]() Current Rebreather/s: Classic Kiss Other Rebreather/s: Inspiration Classic Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: UK, Brighton
Posts: 1,970
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | whaddya want chris, I've got a pile of data somewhere. Key points; 797 has an absorbency some 1.2 times higher (measured in co2/kg) than spherasorb. Spherasorb claims a better packing structure than 797, which would imply a lower WOB and hence lower CO2 production from WOB. I've seen no TEST DATA to support this. Spherasorb has a better resistance to physical churn, which reduces its dustyness. So the big question that leaves is, does the Sphera reduced WOB offset its lower absorbence? Finally, Spherasorb is cheaper than 797 by about 40% (disclaimer, I looked up this price about 8 months ago). /Zak
__________________ Eagles May Soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines! ![]() Rebreather World Terms of service Real diving t-shirts for real divers |
| (Offline) | |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| Who loves ya, baby ![]() ![]() Current Rebreather/s: | Sodasorb 6-12, easiest to get and least expensive absorbant around here.
__________________ Cheers Stefan "Political Correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.!" |
| (Offline) | |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| RebreatherWorld Sponsor ![]() Current Rebreather/s: Inspiration Classic Classic Kiss Other CCR Other Rebreather/s: Inspiration Classic Inspiration Vision Evolution Megalodon Optima Other CCR Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Costa del Sol, Spain
Posts: 212
![]() | Quote: (Originally Posted by wreckweasel) whaddya want chris, I've got a pile of data somewhere. Thanks Zak, speaking from my personal experience the sphera packs a lot better and requires less tapping than 797 to get it settled WOB is noticably different and there is significantly less dust. I always err on the side of caution regarding duration so I have yet to be concerned with the lower absorbence.Key points; 797 has an absorbency some 1.2 times higher (measured in co2/kg) than spherasorb. Spherasorb claims a better packing structure than 797, which would imply a lower WOB and hence lower CO2 production from WOB. I've seen no TEST DATA to support this. Spherasorb has a better resistance to physical churn, which reduces its dustyness. So the big question that leaves is, does the Sphera reduced WOB offset its lower absorbence? Finally, Spherasorb is cheaper than 797 by about 40% (disclaimer, I looked up this price about 8 months ago). /Zak Chris
__________________ Cheers, Chris www.tech-blue.com The site dedicated to Rebreather and Technical diving "We only sell what we dive" |
| (Offline) | |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| Fighting Girl Current Rebreather/s: Sport Kiss Other Rebreather/s: Join Date: May 2005 Location: Land of Oz
Posts: 574
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Quote: (Originally Posted by dteubner) Sperasorb - much less dust than anything else I've used. I hate dust. Big girlie Dave T ![]()
__________________ Andrew Bowie Rebreather-friendly Buddy |
| (Offline) | |