+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Optimizing Underwater Warfare

  1. #1
    King of the Geeks
    heyydude has a reputation beyond repute heyydude has a reputation beyond repute heyydude has a reputation beyond repute heyydude has a reputation beyond repute heyydude has a reputation beyond repute heyydude has a reputation beyond repute heyydude has a reputation beyond repute heyydude has a reputation beyond repute heyydude has a reputation beyond repute heyydude has a reputation beyond repute heyydude has a reputation beyond repute heyydude's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Addison, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    1,429
    HAMMERHEAD!

    Optimizing Underwater Warfare

    Here's a link to an article recently published, for those of you interested in military diving:

    Optimizing Underwater Warfare - - Special Operations Technology


    Kevin Juergensen
    Juergensen Defense Corporation
    Juergensen Marine, Inc.

  2. #2
    Subsea Systems koputai is just really nice koputai is just really nice koputai is just really nice koputai is just really nice koputai is just really nice koputai is just really nice koputai is just really nice koputai is just really nice koputai is just really nice koputai is just really nice koputai's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    351

    Re: Optimizing Underwater Warfare

    "The United Kingdom’s Royal Navy, the Australian Navy and NATO also make use of equipment that incorporates the Juergensen component."

    Not true, the Australian Navy does not use any Juergensen components.
    Whatever happened to truth in advertising?

    Cheers,
    Jason.

  3. #3
    King of the Geeks
    heyydude has a reputation beyond repute heyydude has a reputation beyond repute heyydude has a reputation beyond repute heyydude has a reputation beyond repute heyydude has a reputation beyond repute heyydude has a reputation beyond repute heyydude has a reputation beyond repute heyydude has a reputation beyond repute heyydude has a reputation beyond repute heyydude has a reputation beyond repute heyydude has a reputation beyond repute heyydude's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Addison, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    1,429
    HAMMERHEAD!

    Re: Optimizing Underwater Warfare

    Quote Originally Posted by koputai  View Original Post
    "The United Kingdom’s Royal Navy, the Australian Navy and NATO also make use of equipment that incorporates the Juergensen component."

    Not true, the Australian Navy does not use any Juergensen components.
    Whatever happened to truth in advertising?

    Cheers,
    Jason.
    You're very correct. The RN chose the Divex Stealth, which has not gone into service as yet, and (in fact) they have just extended the contracts for service and support of the CDBA with Carleton. They are also well aware that the Viper E electronics they liked during the trials are available for the Mark 16.

    During the interview, I discussed the Viper E and Mark 16 - I believe the writer lumped Carleton and us together as regards the RN/RAN.

    And this wasn't an "advertisement" - we were approached by the writer and asked to comment on the USN EOD units. We don't advertise in the publication.

    Hope this helps clear things up for you.

    Kevin Juergensen
    Juergensen Defense Corporation
    Last edited by heyydude; 25th May 2008 at 13:45.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts