+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Deco Model Poll take 2...

  1. #1
    RBW Founder schford has a reputation beyond repute schford has a reputation beyond repute schford has a reputation beyond repute schford has a reputation beyond repute schford has a reputation beyond repute schford has a reputation beyond repute schford has a reputation beyond repute schford has a reputation beyond repute schford has a reputation beyond repute schford has a reputation beyond repute schford has a reputation beyond repute schford's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    3,557

    Deco Model Poll take 2...

    Hi guys,

    following on from the other Poll I wanted to do take 2, simpyfing it down to just which deco model rather than how you use the deco model...

    If you use the VR3 currently but Buhlman + Pyle isnt your bag then choose what is...

    Make sure ya ll vote!

    Stuart

  2. #2
    RBW Member Padowan is just really nice Padowan is just really nice Padowan is just really nice Padowan is just really nice Padowan is just really nice Padowan is just really nice Padowan is just really nice Padowan is just really nice Padowan is just really nice Padowan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Exeter, UK.
    Posts
    566
    I like the simple user interface of V-Planner, but I like the more obvious controllability of the "curve" that GF's allow.

    I also like the individual waypoint output information (for example litres of gas required for each stop) that Decoplanner (for example) gives.

  3. #3
    PRISM DIVER & LUVIN IT! dive2dive2000 is just really nice dive2dive2000 is just really nice dive2dive2000 is just really nice dive2dive2000 is just really nice dive2dive2000 is just really nice dive2dive2000 is just really nice dive2dive2000 is just really nice dive2dive2000 is just really nice dive2dive2000 is just really nice dive2dive2000 is just really nice dive2dive2000's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    883

    Cool

    Hi all,

    When diving at home which is once to twice a week, weather permiting. I really do not notice a difference, between RGBM, VPM/B, or GF. But when I go away on vacation or dive for 2 to 10 days in a row RGBM wins hands down. There is a huge difference in the way my body feels. So I just use RGBM all the time. I am real curious to see how this will change once I go CCR




    Martin

  4. #4
    Custom Title Allowed! Robert Cook is on a distinguished road Robert Cook is on a distinguished road Robert Cook's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    143
    I'm using GFs for now, but I'm thinking about moving to DCAP soon - I haven't had a chance to play around with the software yet, though,

    Thanks,
    Robert

  5. #5
    Kevin Hagerich Helium_diver is an unknown quantity at this point Helium_diver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Baltimore MD USA
    Posts
    186
    KISS Classic

    ccr dolphin

    Just got my VR3 and only have a handful of dives with it but have been very happy with the way i feel after a dive. Use v planner for my backup tables and the time seem to be pretty close to each other.

    Helium_diver
    "If I look unconscious I probably am " Bill Hartman

  6. #6
    RBW Member decoweenie has a reputation beyond repute decoweenie has a reputation beyond repute decoweenie has a reputation beyond repute decoweenie has a reputation beyond repute decoweenie has a reputation beyond repute decoweenie has a reputation beyond repute decoweenie has a reputation beyond repute decoweenie has a reputation beyond repute decoweenie has a reputation beyond repute decoweenie has a reputation beyond repute decoweenie has a reputation beyond repute decoweenie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Dubai
    Posts
    5,516
    Quote Originally Posted by Helium_diver
    Just got my VR3 and only have a handful of dives with it but have been very happy with the way i feel after a dive. Use v planner for my backup tables and the time seem to be pretty close to each other.
    Is it just me but it doesn't make logical sense that a ZHL+Pyle algorithm computer with hidden conservatism to have pretty close RT to a VPM table.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts