| |
![]() | |
| | #31 (permalink) |
| Mature mouth breather Current Rebreather/s: Prism Topaz Other Rebreather/s: Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: U.S.A. Brooklyn, New York
Posts: 1,873
| Re: Diving Hypoxic Diluent on a Normoxic Dive Without getting cute with gas laws; wouldn't all the gasses in the loop be expanding at the same amount? With no injections the fO2 wont change. The pO2 will drop due to decreasing pressure. This has nothing to do with hypoxic V's normoxic dil. That's what I don't get, I think He would expand faster than N2 during ascent. I would think that whatever He that's left on ascent from a dive with 10/90 would expand more/faster from 20m to surface than whatever N2 is left in the loop from a dive with air dil ascending the from the same 20m... |
| (Offline) | |
| | #32 (permalink) |
| Ladies bring a plate ![]() Current Rebreather/s: | Re: Diving Hypoxic Diluent on a Normoxic Dive That's what I don't get, I think He would expand faster than N2 during ascent. I would think that whatever He that's left on ascent from a dive with 10/90 would expand more/faster from 20m to surface than whatever N2 is left in the loop from a dive with air dil ascending the from the same 20m... What you are thinking is correct but at the pressures we are talking about here, 1-10 bar, the difference is very very small, I doubt you would pick it. Someone who has had their coffee today can do the math![]()
__________________ WARNING: I contain occasional coarse language, extreme sexual references, nudity, and adult themes, which may offend some people - Usually churchy types. |
| (Offline) | |
| | #33 (permalink) |
| Pedant Current Rebreather/s: Sport Kiss Classic Kiss Other Rebreather/s: Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 221
| Re: Diving Hypoxic Diluent on a Normoxic Dive That's what I don't get, I think He would expand faster than N2 during ascent. I would think that whatever He that's left on ascent from a dive with 10/90 would expand more/faster from 20m to surface than whatever N2 is left in the loop from a dive with air dil ascending the from the same 20m... At the pressures we are talking about all of these gasses behave as ideal gasses as described by the universal gas law.1 litre of helium at 90m will be 10 l at the surface 1 l of oxygen at 90m will be 10 l at the surface 1 l of nitrogen at 90m will be 10l at the surface 1 l of 10/60 trimix at 90m will be 10l of 10/60 at the surface. etc The differences in rates of expansion of different gas components is a theoretical issue and of absolutely no relevance at all to the point in question. Dave T |
| (Offline) | |
| | #34 (permalink) |
| Mature mouth breather Current Rebreather/s: Prism Topaz Other Rebreather/s: Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: U.S.A. Brooklyn, New York
Posts: 1,873
| Re: Diving Hypoxic Diluent on a Normoxic Dive At the pressures we are talking about all of these gasses behave as ideal gasses as described by the universal gas law. 1 litre of helium at 90m will be 10 l at the surface 1 l of oxygen at 90m will be 10 l at the surface 1 l of nitrogen at 90m will be 10l at the surface 1 l of 10/60 trimix at 90m will be 10l of 10/60 at the surface. etc The differences in rates of expansion of different gas components is a theoretical issue and of absolutely no relevance at all to the point in question. Dave T Dave, thanks for the explanation. But, wouldn't there be a difference in the amount of pressure inside cylinders holding the volumes listed above? 2 small cyls, one holding 10 ltrs of He and the other with 10 ltrs of air, wouldn't have the same psi, right? And if these pressures are different, then wouldn't there be different rate of expansion also? And wouldn't even a little bit of variation of these densities and expansion rates affect the PO2? I guess that even if this is true, it might not be detectable. Sorry to be thick headed, and I'm perfectly willing to accept that I might have imagined the more frequent injects on the shallow end of the 8/65 ascent, just making sure I understand... -Andy |
| (Offline) | |
| | #35 (permalink) |
| "Two Sheds" Current Rebreather/s: Classic Kiss Other Rebreather/s: Classic Kiss Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: East Surrey
Posts: 632
| Re: Diving Hypoxic Diluent on a Normoxic Dive Dave, thanks for the explanation. But, wouldn't there be a difference in the amount of pressure inside cylinders holding the volumes listed above? 2 small cyls, one holding 10 ltrs of He and the other with 10 ltrs of air, wouldn't have the same psi, right? Wrong. Basic physics gives us: Pressure x Volume / Temperature is constant, irrespective of the gas. The psi would be identical, until you start getting up to 3000 or 4000 psi, where you'll notice a tiny, tiny difference. Janos
__________________ You can lead a horse to water but you can't climb a ladder with a large bell in both hands - Vic Reeves www.hellfins.com/shed |
| (Offline) | |
| | #36 (permalink) |
| New Member Current Rebreather/s: Evolution Ouroboros Other Rebreather/s: Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Mansfield Nottinghamshire UK
Posts: 26
| Diving Hypoxic Diluent on a Normoxic Dive just to go back to the origional point 10/50 is NOT an allowable gas for normoxic trimix course, if you read the standards (carefully) it says dives must be conducted on normoxic trimix diluent. This means breathable at the surface, I used the standards posted on their website here:10/50 is of course not breathable at the surface http://www.iantd.com/standards/IANTD_Standards_2003[1].pdf I can't get the link to work, if you cut and paste this in to your browser you should get there. on page 55 as my reference. They're dated 2003 so may not be current.
__________________ "Blessed are they who learn from their mistakes. For they shall make, if not necessarily fewer of them, different and more interesting ones." Martin Last edited by vulcan : 14th September 2006 at 10:01. Reason: faulty link |
| (Offline) | |
| | #37 (permalink) |
| Pedant Current Rebreather/s: Sport Kiss Classic Kiss Other Rebreather/s: Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 221
| Re: Diving Hypoxic Diluent on a Normoxic Dive Dave, thanks for the explanation. But, wouldn't there be a difference in the amount of pressure inside cylinders holding the volumes listed above? 2 small cyls, one holding 10 ltrs of He and the other with 10 ltrs of air, wouldn't have the same psi, right? And if these pressures are different, then wouldn't there be different rate of expansion also? And wouldn't even a little bit of variation of these densities and expansion rates affect the PO2? I guess that even if this is true, it might not be detectable. Sorry to be thick headed, and I'm perfectly willing to accept that I might have imagined the more frequent injects on the shallow end of the 8/65 ascent, just making sure I understand... -Andy Exactly what Janos said. The densities of the gasses (which are quite different) do not have anything to do with the pressure/volume relationship. In your example the cylinder of air would be a bit heavier but have exactly the same pressure as the cylinder of helium.The universal gas equation states that for an 'ideal gas' PV=nRT Where: P = pressure of the gas V= volume of the gas n = quantity of gas present (expressed in moles) R = gas constant whcih varies with the units used T = temperature of the gas. Only when the gas is not 'ideal' does this relationship break down. The gasses we are talking about depart from the 'ideal' a bit in our tanks but not our loops. Dave T |
| (Offline) | |
| | #38 (permalink) |
| RBW Member Current Rebreather/s: Inspiration Classic Inspiration Vision Evolution Sport Kiss Classic Kiss Dolphin Ray Azimuth Home Build Other Rebreather/s: Dolphin Ray Azimuth Home Build Join Date: May 2005 Location: UK
Posts: 664
| Re: Diving Hypoxic Diluent on a Normoxic Dive I used the standards posted on their website here: yes those are the current ones, they state that dives must be done on normoxic trimixhttp://www.iantd.com/standards/IANTD_Standards_2003[1].pdf I can't get the link to work, if you cut and paste this in to your browser you should get there. on page 55 as my reference. They're dated 2003 so may not be current. |
| (Online) | |
| | #39 (permalink) |
| Mature mouth breather Current Rebreather/s: Prism Topaz Other Rebreather/s: Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: U.S.A. Brooklyn, New York
Posts: 1,873
| Re: Diving Hypoxic Diluent on a Normoxic Dive Exactly what Janos said. The densities of the gasses (which are quite different) do not have anything to do with the pressure/volume relationship. In your example the cylinder of air would be a bit heavier but have exactly the same pressure as the cylinder of helium. The universal gas equation states that for an 'ideal gas' PV=nRT Where: P = pressure of the gas V= volume of the gas n = quantity of gas present (expressed in moles) R = gas constant whcih varies with the units used T = temperature of the gas. Only when the gas is not 'ideal' does this relationship break down. The gasses we are talking about depart from the 'ideal' a bit in our tanks but not our loops. Dave T Dave, thanks for going further with the explanation. I had trouble in tmix class with the ideal gas law and understanding anything much past gasses only behaving differently under very high pressures. But I still wonder if there really were more injects on ascent from the dives with hypox dil than with air. Do we have a good way of knowing how much He we off-gass back into the loop? Assuming a high He dil, it would be more than any N2 we have taken up during descent-more going in and coming out faster than the smaller, slower amount of N2. So wouldn't off-gassing from a high He descent affect the PO2? I don't imagine it would take much to cause a few more injects during ascent, considering that injects occur as soon as PO2 falls even a little below SP. Wouldn't this be consistant with the general idea behind using He to cut down on deco obligations-comes out faster-and the move towords slowing ascent rates? -Andy |
| (Offline) | |