| |
![]() | |
| | #11 (permalink) |
| Sic Semper Tyrannis ![]() Current Rebreather/s: Evolution Other Rebreather/s: Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Nashua, NH
Posts: 213
| Re: Vision software and Macs here is an independent link to a comparison of the products. parallels vs fusion hope that helps, it touches a little on the fact that fusion has problems with pixilation of certain programs and it just simply does not run some programs that are for windows even though they are both VM's
__________________ -Tom- "slow is smooth, and smooth is fast" TM "Insanity is repeating the same thing over and over again, expecting different results" Albert Einstein |
| (Offline) | |
| | #12 (permalink) |
| New Member Current Rebreather/s: Classic Kiss Other Rebreather/s: Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Toronto, CANADA
Posts: 70
| Re: Vision software and Macs I had parallels and switched to Fusion. It seems more robust and well-featured. R
__________________ "I don't want to sell anything, buy anything, or process anything as a career. I don't want to sell anything bought or processed, or buy anything sold or processed, or process anything sold, bought, or processed, or repair anything sold, bought, or processed. You know, as a career, I don't want to do that." -Lloyd Dobler, (John Cusack) Say Anything CK329 |
| (Offline) | |