| |
![]() | |
| | #11 (permalink) |
| New Member Current Rebreather/s: Home Build Not Bought Yet Other Rebreather/s: Home Build Not Bought Yet Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: London
Posts: 37
| Re: underwater text messaging WTF I just found out that Montauk also holds the Annual Brits vs Yanks Tournament...seems like some people over here are feeling oppressed Last edited by jvk : 10th April 2008 at 10:25. |
| (Offline) | |
| | #12 (permalink) |
| New Member Current Rebreather/s: Home Build Not Bought Yet Other Rebreather/s: Home Build Not Bought Yet Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: London
Posts: 37
| Re: underwater text messaging Things I noted 'we use text messaging technology'. Nice. An attempt to associate with the SMS experience, yet sms doesnt use predefined messages you set on the surface. My thoughts exactly. You need to pre-define the messages on a PC before diving. Not very useful IMO, but it could be fun "there's a shark behind you"... if it doesn't turn out to be vaporware. Looks like they've spent considerable money on developing it (3 patents, DEMA, the website etc). Specs are on their website, under "Support > Support" again. The unit uses ultrasonic technology. |
| (Offline) | |
| | #13 (permalink) |
| Apprentice Luddite ![]() ![]() Current Rebreather/s: Classic Kiss Other Rebreather/s: Inspiration Classic Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: UK, Brighton
Posts: 2,105
| Re: underwater text messaging Mind you, could be fun seeing whats predefined. Think I'd have
__________________ Eagles May Soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines! ![]() RBW Terms of service |
| (Offline) | |
| | #14 (permalink) |
| Yak Current Rebreather/s: MK 15.X Home Build Other Rebreather/s: Classic Kiss Home Build Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: North...
Posts: 1,383
| Re: underwater text messaging You've missed off the ever popular "f*** it", "what the f*** was that?" and "f*** off". Predictive text on my phone isn't hard worked, it's generally a combination of "f***" and a preposition ![]()
__________________ Can you imagine drifting along in the sea with your mouth open and a load of f***ing plankton going in? You'd like it, would you? www.westons-cider.co.uk Azerbaijani Association of Technical Divers Publicity Officer and Goat Wrangler |
| (Offline) | |
| | #15 (permalink) |
| Custom Title Allowed! Current Rebreather/s: MK 15.X Other CCR Other SCR Other Rebreather/s: Other CCR Other SCR Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Loughborough England uk
Posts: 347
| Re: underwater text messaging That nice, I remember we all discussed this some time back in 2005 with military controller project and systems. That what all the holes in the green brick was for LOL. Not quite your qwerty keyboard (the other bits were for the C02 detector we offered). It was shown at DEMA 05 and 06 I guess now that others have patented the idea, not much chance of us making any more. Photo from the RBW site 2005 military rebreather controllers. http://www.rebreatherworld.com/gener...stick-1st.html Iain Middlebrook ![]() |
| (Offline) | |
| | #16 (permalink) |
| DE/MD/NJ Wreck Diver Current Rebreather/s: | Re: underwater text messaging I saw the demo at DEMA and while the text messaging is nice, it isn't a bad emergency location system. Shortcomings being signals being bounced off wrecks and high pieces of wreckage. They explained that while it might not take you on a direct route, it will eventually guide you to the signal being output. One of the neat features is if your unit is pinged by the boat or another diver and you don't respond within a specified period of time, the unit automatically sends out an SOS homing signal for other units to pick up. I tried to explain to them that the technology, assuming it works, would be more beneficial to technical divers. They insisted I was wrong and that their target market was the recreational diver and dive charter business catering to that market.....thus the lack He & only one a single gas program. They actually had working units and were demoing them. They worked well in and around the booth. ![]() Richie |
| (Offline) | |
| | #17 (permalink) |
| RBW Member Current Rebreather/s: | Re: underwater text messaging That nice, I remember we all discussed this some time back in 2005 with military controller project and systems. That what all the holes in the green brick was for LOL. Not quite your qwerty keyboard (the other bits were for the C02 detector we offered). It was shown at DEMA 05 and 06 I guess now that others have patented the idea, not much chance of us making any more. Iain, in the US, patents work with the "first to invent" rule. Most companies involved in dive gear are too amateur to do proper log books, so have no proof they invented it until they show it at a show or file a patent application. If you show your bound log book with the development, signed by a boss or a QA manager regularly, you could claim the patents off them. This is a trick some companies specialise in: let the competitors patent everything, then claim the patents because the owner is the one who invented it first. You have to show a bit more than "holes in the case" though!Alex |
| (Offline) | |
| | #18 (permalink) |
| Custom Title Allowed! Current Rebreather/s: MK 15.X Other CCR Other SCR Other Rebreather/s: Other CCR Other SCR Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Loughborough England uk
Posts: 347
| Re: underwater text messaging Iain, Most companies involved in dive gear are too amateur to do proper log books, so have no proof they invented it until they show it at a show or file a patent application. You have to show a bit more than "holes in the case" though! Alex Hahaha You talking about us? LOL You know us too well Alex.No dont worry we keep every scrap of paper, every meeting log, every drawing including the ones on fag packets, and the doodles, and there stored for 20 years, including jpegs now. After then no ones can remember what the heck it was for in the first place. As for showing a bit more than holes in the case I agree but what the heck do you think they were for? besides if we told everyone all about what it was for and who it was designed for etc they would be as wise as me (or laugh). Frankly in UK patents are too expensive to file and to expensive to uphold and defend. Most small companies would go bust trying. A better solution (for us) is to try and sell to the big companies and let them defend it. Leaving us with just a manufacturing agreement. Beside RBW or any other forum isnt interested in the main in full details of diving equiment design. iain |
| (Offline) | |