| |
![]() | |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Petri Keskitalo ![]() Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Sweden
Posts: 277
| Difference between breathing hoses With all these WOB discussions i would like to know how big difference you could get with hoses with a smooth inner (cooper etc) compared to corrugated hoses (like most manufacturers use)? And what would be optimal I.D?
__________________ P3 |
| (Offline) | |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| I like diving ![]() Mk15.5, Mk15 Inpisspiration, KISS Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Honolulu
Posts: 814
| Re: Difference between breathing hoses With all these WOB discussions i would like to know how big difference you could get with hoses with a smooth inner (cooper etc) compared to corrugated hoses (like most manufacturers use)? I'm not being scientific here, but my feeling is that a smooth inner compared to corrugated hoses will make little or no difference to WOB. I think the major issues there are major constrictions, and counterlung positioning. I have noticed no difference between diving Cooper hoses on my Mk 15.5 compared to standard hoses.And what would be optimal I.D? I think that a 1.25" ID is pretty ideal. I don't think you get much added benefit from a larger ID, especially if there are any constrictions smaller than that in the unit. Aloha, Charlie
__________________ "Foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds." - Emerson "Hobgoblin is a cool word." - Charlie Last edited by chunter; 13th February 2008 at 18:53.. |
| (Offline) | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| rEvo's daddy ![]() ![]() rEvo Join Date: May 2005 Location: belgium
Posts: 3,637
| Re: Difference between breathing hoses I'm not being scientific here, but my feeling is that a smooth inner compared to corrugated hoses will make little or no difference to WOB. I think the major issues there are major constrictions, and counterlung positioning. I have noticed no difference between diving Cooper hoses on my Mk 15.5 compared to standard hoses. just to give an idee: the 2.4 WOB we got in the highly modified rEvo, was with: drager ray hoses!!! (the ones we currently have on the rEvo's)I think that a 1.25" ID is pretty ideal. I don't think you get much added benefit from a larger ID, especially if there are any constrictions smaller than that in the unit. Aloha, Charlie paul
__________________ www.rEvo-rebreathers.com ...."Yes you have to pre-breathe to activate the scrubber sorb, anyone who says different doesn't know what they are talking about!"... .... to get more accurate CO2 injection in the breathing machine we put 2 mass flow controllers in series ... .... radial scrubbers give longer dwell time than axials... .... the earth is flat and ... |
| (Offline) | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Moderator ![]() ![]() | Re: Difference between breathing hoses Hoses have additional trade-offs that have to be considered in answering your question. You can make them bigger inside, but too big becomes a minus. You also start to get problems with stiffness and comfort with certain configurations. Length of the breathing loop come into play, too. It's not a one size fits all kind of answer. The hoses, canister and other components of the loop determine what will be the best fit. |
| (Offline) | |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Banned Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 0
| Re: Difference between breathing hoses I have noticed no difference between diving Cooper hoses on my Mk 15.5 compared to standard hoses. Agreed. Cooper, Draeger Ray, and Dreager Dolphin hoses on a Mark-15 all breathe the same to me. Coopers are easier to dry out, but that's about it. Ray hoses still dive best... flexable and comfy. Love 'em. Dave . |
| (Offline) | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |