| |
![]() | |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Custom Title Allowed! Current Rebreather/s: Megalodon Classic Kiss Other Rebreather/s: Sport Kiss Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 425
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Version 2.01k vs current Hello, What are the differences between 2.01k and the current version of the software? Can the headsets be upgraded-- if so, at what cost? Are there any meaningful differences in the hardware? Sincerely, Paul |
| (Offline) | |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Tim Owens Current Rebreather/s: Megalodon Other Rebreather/s: Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Coconut Creek, FL
Posts: 538
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Version 2.01k vs current Hello, Last Item on FAQ... http://www.customrebreathers.com/faq.htmlWhat are the differences between 2.01k and the current version of the software? Can the headsets be upgraded-- if so, at what cost? Are there any meaningful differences in the hardware? Sincerely, Paul ~$100 for s/w upgrade + shipping providing you have Jaksa solenoid, major change is addition of ASP, that and more you can read about here... http://www.customrebreathers.com/APE..._5%20rev_A.pdf Hardware wise, the major change was computer\bainbox was modified w/ resealable potting compound and some other stuff I forget. Retrofitting hw is not advised as it would be fairly costly. -Tim
__________________ "You want a bailout bottle? Go get the pink one from Fill Express, B*TCH!" - John Cogan "If I sent my rebreather back, I might live longer, but would I live more?" - Abbo |
| (Offline) | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Pacific Northwest ![]() ![]() Current Rebreather/s: Megalodon Other Rebreather/s: Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 556
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Version 2.01k vs current What are the differences between 2.01k and the current version of the software? IMHO the adaptive injection algorithm alone would be worth the $100 to upgrade to 2.06. My understanding is the new algorithm passed the CE tests (see ISC Information) whereas the prior could not being a fixed injection per time period unrelated to PO2 divergence. The other stuff is nice to have, but not as critical. |
| (Online) | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| New Member Current Rebreather/s: Megalodon Other Rebreather/s: Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: London
Posts: 28
![]() | Re: Version 2.01k vs current i agree it is worth upgrading for the adaptive injection. The more i use asp the more i like it, so this is also a nice feature to have. |
| (Offline) | |