It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register for free click here
Rebreather World
       
Go Back Rebreather World Rebreathers, Components and Accessories Closed Circuit Rebreathers O2ptima (aka Optima) Rebreather

My O2ptima Configuration



Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 14th February 2007, 15:15   #11 (permalink)
Custom Title Allowed!
 
n2diving's Avatar

Current Rebreather/s:
Optima
Other CCR

Other Rebreather/s:
Inspiration Classic
Other CCR
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 271
n2diving is just really nicen2diving is just really nicen2diving is just really nicen2diving is just really nicen2diving is just really nicen2diving is just really nicen2diving is just really nicen2diving is just really nicen2diving is just really nice
Re: My O2ptima Configuration

> Do you have a second stage attached to the Diluent tank?
Yes, the RiteSource is a BC integrated second stage. Switching to it is incredibly fast, in part because recovery of the second stage is something that will be practiced multiple times on every dive. I'm aware of many O2ptima divers who have both an outboard bailout and a RiteSource. The emergency strategy is the extremely fast switch to the RiteSource for the sanity breaths and then either return to the loop or switch to offboard bailout. However, some experts consider the RiteSource an additional risk on deeper technical dives.

>do you consider the adv suitable for bailout?
No, the O2ptima ADV is not suitable for OC bailout.

>Are you going to just use the plastic plug for the scrubber or do you plan to eventually make a delrin insert?
No, the factory installed cartridge plug is already in place, is a hassle to remove, and I fail to see any advantage to replacing it with one made of delrin. If you are ultra paranoid about it, keep the plug from the previous cartridge and put one in both ends.

> Have you considered diving without a full cover?
No, although the prototypes did not have covers. I like the cover, it streamlines the unit and reduces posibility of line traps. It's extremely light weight and I do not to see any benefit to removing it. I'm not aware of anyone who is diving their O2ptima without a cover, but if you don't want it I see no objection to removing it.

> Would it be easier to add a hose with (Kiss style gas addition) with a laser cut orifice and a ball valve?
No, and I'm not aware of any O2ptimas that have been modified this way. I don't see any benefit to adding a constant flow valve other than to reduce the number of manual O2 additions, which are not at all burdensome for me or my sister. My sister has a camera in her hands most of the time and she says managing her PO2 manually is no trouble. If you are asking why we don't dive an mCCR instead of an eCCR, that's a discussion for another forum.

Last edited by n2diving : 14th February 2007 at 15:46.
(Offline)
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 14th February 2007, 15:26   #12 (permalink)
Underwater Mechanic
 
Crazyduck's Avatar

Current Rebreather/s:
Other CCR

Other Rebreather/s:
Other CCR
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: TEXAS, Dallas/ Ft.Worth
Posts: 711
Crazyduck is a jewel in the roughCrazyduck is a jewel in the roughCrazyduck is a jewel in the roughCrazyduck is a jewel in the roughCrazyduck is a jewel in the roughCrazyduck is a jewel in the roughCrazyduck is a jewel in the roughCrazyduck is a jewel in the rough
Re: My O2ptima Configuration

Thank you...
Regards Andrew
__________________
Howdy Senor- What’s Happening!
Rob Davie April 2005-

Presently in a state of transition from Open Circuit to Closed Circuit.

"You will not be punished for your anger; you will be punished by it." - Buddha.
(Online)
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 14th February 2007, 23:02   #13 (permalink)
Custom Title Allowed!
 
MarcLaukien's Avatar

Current Rebreather/s:
Other CCR

Other Rebreather/s:
Optima
Other CCR
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: South East Florida
Posts: 202
MarcLaukien has a spectacular aura aboutMarcLaukien has a spectacular aura aboutMarcLaukien has a spectacular aura aboutMarcLaukien has a spectacular aura aboutMarcLaukien has a spectacular aura aboutMarcLaukien has a spectacular aura about
Re: My O2ptima Configuration

Quote: (Originally Posted by n2diving) View Original Post
However, some experts consider the RiteSource an additional risk on deeper technical dives.
What is this risk which some experts believe it has on deeper tech dives? Freeflow? Wouldn't this be a risk regardless of depth?

Quote: (Originally Posted by n2diving) View Original Post
>do you consider the adv suitable for bailout?
No, the O2ptima ADV is not suitable for OC bailout.
Sorry for this basic question, but what is an ADV, and how does it relate to OC bailout?
(Online)
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 14th February 2007, 23:20   #14 (permalink)
Custom Title Allowed!
 
sensor330's Avatar

Current Rebreather/s:
Megalodon

Other Rebreather/s:
Not Bought Yet
Inspiration Classic
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 583
sensor330 is a jewel in the roughsensor330 is a jewel in the roughsensor330 is a jewel in the roughsensor330 is a jewel in the roughsensor330 is a jewel in the roughsensor330 is a jewel in the roughsensor330 is a jewel in the rough
Send a message via Yahoo to sensor330
Re: My O2ptima Configuration

[quote=n2diving;96308]
Primary Monitoring: It's unclear to me how not monitoring the primary handset in our configuration could lead to a situation where we did not know our PO2. The typical configuration does require the diver to compare the primary display to the secondary HUD. However, we are monitoring PO2's via four sensors, three via the HUD of the secondary and one completely independent sensor via the VR3, none of which are dependent on operation of the primary. I suppose the primary could fail in two ways: one such that it fires the solenoid and causes a high PO2 or the other such that it does not fire the solenoid and causes a low PO2. In our case, failure of the primary such that a low PO2 is caused is unlikely since we don't rely upon the primary to maintain PO2 and such a failure would go unnoticed. A high PO2 would be noticed by our monitoring the four sensors from two other independent sources as well as the sound of the solenoid firing, which would be abnormal.


quote]

On my primary I've seen one out of the three cells voted out while on the secondary the cells were within spec. When I'm diving and I see that one cell has been voted out, the dive is over. Although it is not a emergency it is something that definitely requires attention, especially if you are doing cave, wreck, or deep diving.

While I haven't yet connected my 4th cell I can not comment on how well it tracks PO2. I have everything to connect it but I have the following concerns:

1. Another calibration to do;
2. two more failure points;
3. another cable to deal with;
4. added complexity; and
5. added maintenance cost.

If anybody can give me some good feed back as to why the 4th cell would be a good addition it would be much appreciated.

Scott
(Offline)
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 15th February 2007, 00:13   #15 (permalink)
Custom Title Allowed!
 
n2diving's Avatar

Current Rebreather/s:
Optima
Other CCR

Other Rebreather/s:
Inspiration Classic
Other CCR
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 271
n2diving is just really nicen2diving is just really nicen2diving is just really nicen2diving is just really nicen2diving is just really nicen2diving is just really nicen2diving is just really nicen2diving is just really nicen2diving is just really nice
Re: My O2ptima Configuration

Quote: (Originally Posted by sensor330) View Original Post
On my primary I've seen one out of the three cells voted out while on the secondary the cells were within spec.
I'm not sure how the oxygen sensors are wired to the handsets in your rebreather, but on the O2ptima, the only circumstance that I'm aware of which could cause such a occurance would be slight calibration differences between the two handsets, which is almost unavoidable. There could be enough variance between the two that one might be voted out on one handset and not on the other. In fact, I would suspect the only time that both handsets would vote out a sensor at exactly the same moment would be when a sensor underwent a sudden and significant change. Normally the secondary handset will indicate a 0.5 or 1 millivolt lower reading on the sensors anyway due (I'm told) to the difference in cable lengths. The behavior would be more likely if the two handsets were not calibrated within a minute or two of each other.
I would not assume a minor calibration variation would be a reason to abort a dive.

Sensor variance is another matter, although again not cause for immediate concern. On my longer dives a sensor variance is common. At some point in a two or three hour dive I would expect to observe a range of 0.1 or 0.2 ATA between the highest and lowest. A wide variance on one of the sensors against the other three would suggest that it be more closely monitored, but would not suggest I immediately abort the dive. Most of these effects are moisture related and transitory, often responding to a dil flush. Monitoring the actual readings of all four would still not seem to require routine monitoring of the primary display, but if I saw a wide variance I always have the option of checking the primary.

The debate of the benefits of a 4th cell seem to be more an issue of personal preference and tolerance for risk vs complexity. Since I sell O2ptima's I've talked to a lot of people about their configuration requirements and have observed that some people feel it's an absolute requirement and others feel it's completely unnecessary. I've heard and read the arguments on both sides. I can only add that it's a popular option and that both my sister and I like having an independently monitored 4th cell.

Last edited by n2diving : 15th February 2007 at 00:42.
(Offline)
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 15th February 2007, 00:36   #16 (permalink)
Custom Title Allowed!
 
n2diving's Avatar

Current Rebreather/s:
Optima
Other CCR

Other Rebreather/s:
Inspiration Classic
Other CCR
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 271
n2diving is just really nicen2diving is just really nicen2diving is just really nicen2diving is just really nicen2diving is just really nicen2diving is just really nicen2diving is just really nicen2diving is just really nicen2diving is just really nice
Re: My O2ptima Configuration

Quote: (Originally Posted by ScubaNerd) View Original Post
What is this risk which some experts believe it has on deeper tech dives? Freeflow? Wouldn't this be a risk regardless of depth?
The problem is more generally considered 'dribbling' that goes unnoticed, but also of course freeflow. While it is always a concern, the impact of dribbling or freeflow on the diluent is greatly magnified at depth and could cause rapid depletion of diluent. Also, part of the concern is rooted in the fact that the ScubaPro AirII, the most popular version of the BC integrated octo, has something of a history of intractable dribbling. Although the Dive Rite RiteSource does not seem to have the same problem, at great depth most would not consider bailout to dil a viable option and therefore having the RiteSource in the configuration is a needless risk.

I agree and consider the RiteSource risks outweigh it's benefits on very deep diving. However, our configuration as presented is for recreational sport diving and I believe it to offer signficant benefits. I've observed a signficant and consistent difference in execution speed between a traditional off board bailout and RiteSource bailout on enough different divers, some very highly skilled, that I think it merits consideration for recreational sport rebreather configurations.
(Offline)
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 13th March 2007, 20:25   #17 (permalink)
O2ptima Test Dummy

 
JPJones's Avatar

Current Rebreather/s:
Inspiration Classic
Megalodon
Sport Kiss
Classic Kiss
Optima
Titan

Other Rebreather/s:
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 367
JPJones has a spectacular aura aboutJPJones has a spectacular aura aboutJPJones has a spectacular aura aboutJPJones has a spectacular aura aboutJPJones has a spectacular aura aboutJPJones has a spectacular aura about
Re: My O2ptima Configuration

8/60 works great and I would disagree with removing the rod I tried it and can cause a false high PO2 reading.
__________________
NSS/CDS Training Chairman
www.jpjscuba.com
(Offline)
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 13th March 2007, 21:59   #18 (permalink)
Custom Title Allowed!
 
n2diving's Avatar

Current Rebreather/s:
Optima
Other CCR

Other Rebreather/s:
Inspiration Classic
Other CCR
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 271
n2diving is just really nicen2diving is just really nicen2diving is just really nicen2diving is just really nicen2diving is just really nicen2diving is just really nicen2diving is just really nicen2diving is just really nicen2diving is just really nice
Re: My O2ptima Configuration

Quote: (Originally Posted by JPJones) View Original Post
8/60 works great and I would disagree with removing the rod I tried it and can cause a false high PO2 reading.
You are correct about removing the rod. The reason Lisa and I can get away with it is we don't rely upon the solenoid injection, we use manual.

However, the new FX rod is a big improvement and I may go back to using it, because it's so painless compared to the previous designs.

-- Mark
(Offline)
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 13th March 2007, 23:12   #19 (permalink)
O2ptima Test Dummy

 
JPJones's Avatar

Current Rebreather/s:
Inspiration Classic
Megalodon
Sport Kiss
Classic Kiss
Optima
Titan

Other Rebreather/s:
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 367
JPJones has a spectacular aura aboutJPJones has a spectacular aura aboutJPJones has a spectacular aura aboutJPJones has a spectacular aura aboutJPJones has a spectacular aura aboutJPJones has a spectacular aura about
Re: My O2ptima Configuration

Quote: (Originally Posted by n2diving) View Original Post
You are correct about removing the rod. The reason Lisa and I can get away with it is we don't rely upon the solenoid injection, we use manual.

However, the new FX rod is a big improvement and I may go back to using it, because it's so painless compared to the previous designs.

-- Mark
I still like my original prototype best but it was not dummy proof enough. I fly auto unless I'm shallow and need the fine control.
__________________
NSS/CDS Training Chairman
www.jpjscuba.com
(Offline)
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Old 15th March 2007, 13:25   #20 (permalink)
New Member
 
wsparks's Avatar

Current Rebreather/s:
Optima

Other Rebreather/s:
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 9
wsparks is on a distinguished roadwsparks is on a distinguished road
Re: My O2ptima Configuration

Quote: (Originally Posted by n2diving) View Original Post
However, the new FX rod is a big improvement and I may go back to using it, because it's so painless compared to the previous designs.

-- Mark
New FX Rod? What changed? Is this something new for me to "upgrade to"???
(Offline)
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.us
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



RebreatherWorld.Com ©2005 - 2008
Rebreather World, Rebreather World and the Rebreather World Logo are Trademarks
All rights reserved, no republishing of content without written permission.
By using this website you have agreed to our Terms & Conditions of Use

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0