| |
![]() | |
| | #11 (permalink) |
| Custom Title Allowed! Current Rebreather/s: Other CCR Other Rebreather/s: Optima Other CCR Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: South East Florida
Posts: 202
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Handsets disagree on MV values Both. In my note to Kevin I suggested that it was a software thing. As I say, I am pretty confident that it's not the cells as I got the exact same behavior from 3 sets of cells. If it's a software problem, then wouldn't everybody with the new handsets see this behavior? |
| (Online) | |
| | #12 (permalink) |
| Moderator ![]() ![]() Current Rebreather/s: Inspiration Classic Sport Kiss Optima rEvo Other CCR Home Build Other Rebreather/s: Inspiration Vision Evolution Megalodon Classic Kiss rEvo Other CCR Home Build Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: "Da" Bronx
Posts: 2,998
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Handsets disagree on MV values Are these the new Delrin handsets? I ask because I had sent Kevin a note on Saturday asking about similar behavior from my new handsets. Flush O2 & get 48 - 52 mv, calibrate Remove O2 Source (I have a meg & use the head calibration kit) watch MV drop to 9-11 range. PO2 in air? .25/.23/.21 Move wires around (i.e. plug wire for cell 1 into cell 3) and still get .25/.23/.21 put in different cells (some new, some old) and still get .25/.23./21 Put the same cells in my spare head with metal handsets - get .21/.20/.21. I haven't heard back from Kevin (it's a holiday weekend and all), but I'm pretty confident that it's not the cell's non-linear performance. Are you using the standard calibration mode or the "altitude" mode where it takes ambient pressure into account..
__________________ Joe Radomski CCR Trimix Instructor Trainer ANDI Instructor Trainer Director #10 All posts are personal opinions and DO NOT reflect any affiliated agency unless specifically stated. |
| (Offline) | |
| | #15 (permalink) |
| Custom Title Allowed! Current Rebreather/s: Optima Other CCR Other Rebreather/s: Inspiration Classic Other CCR Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 271
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Handsets disagree on MV values Try using the bag method of calibration on the head. I've seen it get rid of that slight non-linear behavior... |
| (Offline) | |
| | #16 (permalink) |
| New Member Current Rebreather/s: Optima Other Rebreather/s: Optima Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Ljungsbro_Sweden
Posts: 18
![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Handsets disagree on MV values Are these the new Delrin handsets? I ask because I had sent Kevin a note on Saturday asking about similar behavior from my new handsets. Did you get some answers to this problem from kevin .. ? I must say, it looks most disturbing ....Flush O2 & get 48 - 52 mv, calibrate Remove O2 Source (I have a meg & use the head calibration kit) watch MV drop to 9-11 range. PO2 in air? .21/.25/.23 Move wires around (i.e. plug wire for cell 1 into cell 3) and still get .21/.25/.23 put in different cells (some new, some old) and still get .21/.25/.23 Put the same cells in my spare head with metal handsets - get .21/.20/.21. I haven't heard back from Kevin (it's a holiday weekend and all), but I'm pretty confident that it's not the cell's non-linear performance. ![]() |
| (Offline) | |
| | #17 (permalink) |
| . ![]() Current Rebreather/s: Megalodon Other Rebreather/s: Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 704
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Handsets disagree on MV values Did you get some answers to this problem from kevin .. ? I must say, it looks most disturbing .... I did.![]() It turns out to not be an issue with the HammerHead but rather an issue with the Teledyne R22d Cells I have. I replaced them with AII cells and after a few days of air acclimatization i am getting readings as expected. Interestingly, MV readings are slightly higher than I am used to with the Teledyne cells - 13mv in air instead of 10~11, 60mv in O2 instead of 48~50. Kevin was very responsive and thorough in helping to troubleshoot the issue. T |
| (Offline) | |
| | #18 (permalink) |
| Custom Title Allowed! Current Rebreather/s: Other CCR Other Rebreather/s: Optima Other CCR Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: South East Florida
Posts: 202
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Handsets disagree on MV values Did you get some answers to this problem from kevin .. ? I must say, it looks most disturbing .... I can't speak for trob09, but I had a good email exchange about this with Kevin. He told me that all units are tested with a millivolt generator before delivery. To be on the safe side, he offered me to send back the units for an additional check-up with a millivolt generator. I just sent mine a few days ago, so let's see what the results will be.![]() |
| (Online) | |
| | #19 (permalink) |
| New Member Current Rebreather/s: Optima Other Rebreather/s: Optima Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Ljungsbro_Sweden
Posts: 18
![]() ![]() ![]() | I did. Im happy to hear its not the HH, it will help me sleep better - maybe Im missing something here but how does it explain that you moved around the cells and still got the same readings ? The variance should have "moved" with the cells ? Or are R22d's not compatible with the units somehow.... ? Is the conlusion that you should stay away from R22d 's ?It turns out to not be an issue with the HammerHead but rather an issue with the Teledyne R22d Cells I have. I replaced them with AII cells and after a few days of air acclimatization i am getting readings as expected. Interestingly, MV readings are slightly higher than I am used to with the Teledyne cells - 13mv in air instead of 10~11, 60mv in O2 instead of 48~50. Kevin was very responsive and thorough in helping to troubleshoot the issue. T |
| (Offline) | |
| | #20 (permalink) |
| . ![]() Current Rebreather/s: Megalodon Other Rebreather/s: Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 704
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Handsets disagree on MV values Im happy to hear its not the HH, it will help me sleep better - maybe Im missing something here but how does it explain that you moved around the cells and still got the same readings ? The variance should have "moved" with the cells ? Or are R22d's not compatible with the units somehow.... ? Is the conlusion that you should stay away from R22d 's ? I don't know why moving them around didn't do anything. That part's a mystery. I do know that it has gone away with the AII cells. If I move the wires on these, the numbers move.It's hard for me to say "stay away from r22d's" they've always been solid performers for me in the past. T |
| (Offline) | |