| |
![]() | |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Custom Title Allowed! Current Rebreather/s: Inspiration Classic Other Rebreather/s: Not Bought Yet Inspiration Classic Classic Kiss Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Midlands UK
Posts: 209
| Using Adjustable Needle Valves OK, quick question, partly because I have a swaglok adjstable in the workshop, and wondered if it might be useful. Now Duncan said this of Rick doing 160m on the KISS: "the only modification was the substitution of a needle valve and bypass with depth compensated first stage for the usual KISS valve and fixed IP first stage." Right then, my swagelok with a fixed IP is bang on my resting rate at 12.5 bar. I used to use an Apeks to do this, and it worked just like a KISS vlave, no adjustments necessary. Now, what would be the difference between me running a fixed IP of 12.5 bar and using a compensated reg running at say 4 bar IP over ambient. Once I got to 75m surely the rate would be the same (12.5 bar hitting the orifice) and below 75m would be too high for me, and end up with rising ppO2 all the time? Basically, if the orifice with the swaglok set all the way down is the same size as the KISS, how does it make it possible that you can go deeper than the limit of the valve? Thanks in advance. I've probably missed something very obvious, it just doesn't quite line up in my head at the minute. Unless he did something completely different somewhere along the line.Digs. Last edited by Digger : 6th June 2006 at 19:21. |
| (Offline) | |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Yak Current Rebreather/s: MK 15.X Home Build Other Rebreather/s: Classic Kiss Home Build Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: North...
Posts: 1,387
| Re: Using Adjustable Needle Valves I would have thought a metering valve dialled right down was a lot less than a KISS valve. On mine I needed about 1.25 turns to get a flow equal to metabolic. The flow on mine on the lowest setting was barely a trickle, though the valves aren't rated for shut-off use. Orifices aren't really linear, a reduction in size doesn't necessarily give a proportionate reduction in flow. I've got an Excel spreadsheet somewhere that does a fairly accurate calc based on the valve's data sheet and the reg's IP. It even predicts the right number of turns to open the valve to get a certain flow rate.
__________________ Can you imagine drifting along in the sea with your mouth open and a load of f***ing plankton going in? You'd like it, would you? www.westons-cider.co.uk Azerbaijani Association of Technical Divers Publicity Officer and Goat Wrangler |
| (Offline) | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Crash Test Dummy Current Rebreather/s: Other CCR Other Rebreather/s: Other CCR Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Cairo
Posts: 5,487
| Re: Using Adjustable Needle Valves Quote: (Originally Posted by Digger) ...if the orifice with the swaglok set all the way down is the same size as the KISS, how does it make it possible that you can go deeper than the limit of the valve? What if it is not ?Do you know what is the minimum cross flow area of the Swagelok ? |
| (Offline) | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| RBW Member Current Rebreather/s: Inspiration Classic Inspiration Vision Evolution Sport Kiss Classic Kiss Dolphin Ray Azimuth Home Build Other Rebreather/s: Dolphin Ray Azimuth Home Build Join Date: May 2005 Location: UK
Posts: 665
| Re: Using Adjustable Needle Valves my swagelok valve shuts off completly!! |
| (Offline) | |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Crash Test Dummy Current Rebreather/s: Other CCR Other Rebreather/s: Other CCR Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Cairo
Posts: 5,487
| Re: Using Adjustable Needle Valves Quote: (Originally Posted by dave t) my swagelok valve shuts off completly!! Jeez thanks Dave, it was rhetorical... ![]() |
| (Offline) | |