| |
![]() | |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| New Member Current Rebreather/s: Not Bought Yet Other Rebreather/s: Not Bought Yet Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Newcastle, UK
Posts: 6
| Counter Lung Dimensions Hi, Assuming the correct volume can be achieved, is there an optimum shape for back mounted counterlungs? Or to look at it the other way, are there any limitations on the shape? The reason I ask is that I'm thinking of ways to reduce the profile of a KISS type unit. Would it be possible to use longer/wider bags with a flatter profile? Cheers, Lawrence |
| (Offline) | |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Holger Berghäuser Current Rebreather/s: | Re: Counter Lung Dimensions Hi Lawrence, what is so bad on the KISS shape. On the classic KISS I find the solution to use the spare room between the scrubber and the cylinders a good solution. only the frame is complex in manufacturing. So I build one with an flatten CL. I think the shape of the CL isnt important but the position. A position near the human lung is the best (and if you have this in any position) so the OTS are best then rear or back mounted at least the bellow below the neck (like RB80 does) Holger
__________________ If it makes bubbles it means its brocken Visit: www.tr300.com, Missions: www.rebreatherteam.de |
| (Offline) | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Apprentice Luddite ![]() ![]() Current Rebreather/s: Classic Kiss Other Rebreather/s: Inspiration Classic Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: UK, Brighton
Posts: 2,111
| Re: Counter Lung Dimensions Actually lawrence that'd probably be ideal. I'd suggest the ideal shape* is going to be matching/overlapping your lungs.... and as close to your back as possible. * for backmounted CL's
__________________ Eagles May Soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines! ![]() RBW Terms of service |
| (Offline) | |