| |
![]() | |
| | #21 (permalink) |
| RebreatherWorld Sponsor ![]() Current Rebreather/s: | Re: Trimix Versus HeliOx and Deco time Is there something I am missing here or is someone blazing a new (and dangerous) trail? Regards, Lance ADDED Please, Please......Lets not turn this into a bashing place and lets keep it on subject!! Heliox vs Trimix on Constant Set Point CCR diving is much less of a problem than when you compare Heliox vs Trimix on OC. While I would not run a schedule like the one you describe here switching to a 1.6 atm PO2 at 6 meters it's a sure way of not getting bent. It's old school approach to decompression. (if using Buhlmann) Ascend to 45 msw (expand bubbles) do some decompression then at 6 msw treat with oxygen. Since we know this is agressive if they shaved it all down to 200 min total run time they were probably fine. Here is a link to a PDF where I make the comparison of 10/90 heliox 1.3 set point Hamilton Kenyon Bubble Model HKBM 16/45 trimix 1.3 set point Hamilton Kenyon Bubble Model HKBM 10/90 heliox 1.3 set point / 100% oxygen Buhlmann (raw) http://www.nitroxdiver.com/Training/...le-compare.pdf It's pretty clear that using a bubble model for this helps keep the CNS down, and gives a nice clean decompression. The differences between the heliox and the trimix decompression on the bubble model are reasonable. Profiles generated with NAUTILUS DIVE PLANNER Cheers
__________________ Joel Silverstein, VP COO Tech Diving Limited a Division of Scuba Training and Technology Inc. http://www.nautilusdiveplanner.com FREE NAUTILUS DIVE PLANNER DEMO - REGISTER HERE KISS # 275 |
| (Offline) | |
| | #22 (permalink) |
| New Member Current Rebreather/s: Megalodon Other Rebreather/s: Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Cyprus
Posts: 43
![]() | Re: Trimix Versus HeliOx and Deco time they boosted a little O2 on top of a full cylinder of He and then topped off Dil tanks as required. they were diving 40-60mins bottom, 200 mins total run max We were doing similar bottom times to these and were coming up with total run time nearly an hour longer. Plug their mix in and the end result is over another hour deco longer. It is not possible actually to plan a dive at 75m for a little more than 200 mins under any circumstances. (Given there is only helium as inert gas in your loop, i.e Heliox). I played a little bit with a self-developed deco software and here is what I found: It would be possible to make this dive if the following conditions are met. Unfortunatelly these are lying outsite the commonly acceptable level of risk for the prudent diver:
Cheers, Sotos Last edited by diveoceanos : 4th May 2008 at 06:23. |
| (Offline) | |
| | #23 (permalink) |
| New Member ![]() Current Rebreather/s: Other CCR Home Build Other Rebreather/s: Other CCR Home Build Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Leeds UK
Posts: 98
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Trimix Versus HeliOx and Deco time Hi, I stuck this thru a VPM program. It will do the dive, but only if you imitate a Trimix dive by switching fairly soon to air. Here's a profile I came up with (NB it ain't recommended, it's VPM with zero conservatism, plus as the program rightly shows you have to worry about ICD with the sudden switch to air) Cheers, Charles. Conservatism 0 Leading compartment enters the decompression zone at 60.3m Depth Run Time Stop Time Mix ppO2 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 75.0 m 4.2 min 0.0 min Tx18/82 0.18 - 1.50 - 1.50 Segment ppO2 high! 75.0 m 54.2 min 50.0 min Tx18/82 1.50 - 1.50 - 1.50 Segment ppO2 high! 51.0 m 57.0 min 1.0 min Air 1.50 - 1.08 - 1.26 ICD Warning! 48.0 m 58.0 min 1.0 min Air 1.26 - 1.20 - 1.20 45.0 m 59.0 min 1.0 min Air 1.20 - 1.14 - 1.14 42.0 m 61.0 min 2.0 min Air 1.14 - 1.07 - 1.07 39.0 m 62.0 min 1.0 min Nx32 1.07 - 1.01 - 1.54 36.0 m 64.0 min 2.0 min Nx32 1.54 - 1.45 - 1.45 33.0 m 67.0 min 3.0 min Nx32 1.45 - 1.36 - 1.36 30.0 m 70.0 min 3.0 min Nx32 1.36 - 1.26 - 1.26 27.0 m 73.0 min 3.0 min Nx32 1.26 - 1.17 - 1.17 24.0 m 78.0 min 5.0 min Nx32 1.17 - 1.07 - 1.07 21.0 m 83.0 min 5.0 min Nx50 1.07 - 0.98 - 1.53 18.0 m 89.0 min 6.0 min Nx50 1.53 - 1.38 - 1.38 15.0 m 99.0 min 10.0 min Nx50 1.38 - 1.24 - 1.24 12.0 m 111.0 min 12.0 min Nx50 1.24 - 1.09 - 1.09 9.0 m 128.0 min 17.0 min Nx50 1.09 - 0.94 - 0.94 6.0 m 150.0 min 22.0 min Oxygen 0.94 - 0.79 - 1.59 3.0 m 189.0 min 39.0 min Oxygen 1.59 - 1.29 - 1.29 |
| (Offline) | |
| | #24 (permalink) |
| Custom Title Allowed! ![]() Current Rebreather/s: MK 15.X Ouroboros Other CCR Home Build Other Rebreather/s: Inspiration Classic Other CCR Home Build Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,128
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Trimix Versus HeliOx and Deco time
__________________ Get a girlfriend you sad twat - a Rebreather is an unfaithful mistress - dont blind yourself to her faults just because she goes down on you |
| (Offline) | |
| | #25 (permalink) |
| Custom Title Allowed! ![]() Current Rebreather/s: MK 15.X Ouroboros Other CCR Home Build Other Rebreather/s: Inspiration Classic Other CCR Home Build Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,128
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Trimix Versus HeliOx and Deco time I had an interesting discussion recently regarding gas consumption and deco time when diving on HeliOx as compared to diving with Trimix. My approach to deco planning is: in areas we know very little, its best to be conservative.It came about when we were on our last deep wreck trip and the guys were working out our Helium consumption and then comparing that to what they expected the HeliOx divers would use. I ran the profiles through my planning software and always came up with longer deco and run times compared to the mix we were on. Our mix was 16/45 and the Heliox guys were going to use 10/90 for the same 75m dives. I got a reply back the other day and nearly fell off my chair when I saw what these guys were diving. <paste> As promised (names withheld) did all the blending and they used hardly any He at all- those blokes really know what they're on. they boosted a little O2 on top of a full cylinder of He and then topped off Dil tanks as required. they were diving 40-60mins bottom, 200 mins total run max We were doing similar bottom times to these and were coming up with total run time nearly an hour longer. Plug their mix in and the end result is over another hour deco longer. Is there something I am missing here or is someone blazing a new (and dangerous) trail? Regards, Lance ADDED Please, Please......Lets not turn this into a bashing place and lets keep it on subject!! Ergo, deep and bounce dives, Heliox dives (or near as damn it) I do very conservative deco. Who cares if I have to stay in the water a few hours longer than may be necessary- when you look at the risk V reward of a bad bend a few hours is not at all significant in my opinion. I suspect habitual chasing of shortest deco times will greatly increase risk of injury eventually where as carrying out conservative deco times just means some bastards more likely to have ate all your damn food! (be careful when using hobbits as support divers!]
__________________ Get a girlfriend you sad twat - a Rebreather is an unfaithful mistress - dont blind yourself to her faults just because she goes down on you Last edited by Drmike : 4th May 2008 at 12:55. |
| (Offline) | |
| | #26 (permalink) |
| rEvo combat swimmer ![]() Current Rebreather/s: rEvo Other CCR Other Rebreather/s: rEvo Other CCR Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: chicago
Posts: 443
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Trimix Versus HeliOx and Deco time Dr. Mike--no old bold divers, absolutely. This subject is interesting, I wonder what the comercial and military does, I believe they have both been using heliox for a long time. I'm sure rubicon has some info on the subject. I also believe that the models that we use are not really "good" with heliox. I suspect that it may be possible to do a profile with essentially a long slow descent--lots of short deep stops, and do a safe profile with time similar or shorter than a trimix profile. But I not going to do the research on myself by trying it. I also "wonder" about agressive gas switching, if it is possible to toggle back and forth between N mixes and heliox and avoid IBCD. I believe there should be significant advantages to heliox on CCR's, while avoiding open circuit disadvantages such as cost and multiple gas mixes.
__________________ Heres to you Capt. Bill Never Forget, and stay safe everyone. |
| (Offline) | |
| | #27 (permalink) |
| Custom Title Allowed! ![]() Current Rebreather/s: MK 15.X Ouroboros Other CCR Home Build Other Rebreather/s: Inspiration Classic Other CCR Home Build Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,128
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Trimix Versus HeliOx and Deco time I believe there should be significant advantages to heliox on CCR's, while avoiding open circuit disadvantages such as cost and multiple gas mixes. If diving ccr Heliox (and avoiding risk of IBCD) your bail gas may also have to be Heliox so you may need a good sized booster - and cash. On deep dives and rapid descents Heliox can lead to HPNS so adding some N2 may be beneficial. Descending at 10m/min on a deep dive - no thanks, Ill live with EAD of 30m ish
__________________ Get a girlfriend you sad twat - a Rebreather is an unfaithful mistress - dont blind yourself to her faults just because she goes down on you Last edited by Drmike : 4th May 2008 at 14:06. |
| (Offline) | |
| | #28 (permalink) |
| Custom Title Allowed! ![]() Current Rebreather/s: MK 15.X Ouroboros Other CCR Home Build Other Rebreather/s: Inspiration Classic Other CCR Home Build Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,128
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Trimix Versus HeliOx and Deco time I wonder what the comercial and military does,. see Page 17B-45 Onwards in attached usn MK16 MOD1 deco tables for ccr Heliox dives setpoint 1.3and Rubicon Research Repository: Item 123456789/3552 looking at over 300mins for this dive (compared to 200mins quoted) One point to bare in mind, somepeople have surfaced missing hours of deco and survived...doesnt mean to say you can or that the majority can or that they can next time....
__________________ Get a girlfriend you sad twat - a Rebreather is an unfaithful mistress - dont blind yourself to her faults just because she goes down on you Last edited by Drmike : 4th May 2008 at 14:25. |
| (Offline) | |
| | #30 (permalink) |
| New Member Current Rebreather/s: Megalodon Other Rebreather/s: Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Cyprus
Posts: 43
![]() | Re: Trimix Versus HeliOx and Deco time Some results from my personal software are: Depth: 75m, Time to Leave Bottom: 60th minute. Descent Rate: 10 mpm, Ascent Rate: 10 mpm, Constant PP02: 1.3 ATA, Switch to pure Oxygen at 6m. Diluent: Tx 16/45 Total Run time ----> 230 minutes (no GF) Total Run Time ----> 260 minutes (GFlow: 50%) Diluent: Heliox 10/90 Total Run Time ----> 310 minutes (no GF) Total Run Time ----> 370 minutes (GFlow: 50%) |
| (Offline) | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |