View Single Post
Old 11th February 2007, 14:44   #46 (permalink)
AD_ward9
RBW Member
 
AD_ward9's Avatar

Current Rebreather/s:
Other CCR

Other Rebreather/s:
Other CCR
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Scotland
Posts: 2,011
AD_ward9 has a reputation beyond repute AD_ward9 has a reputation beyond repute AD_ward9 has a reputation beyond repute AD_ward9 has a reputation beyond repute AD_ward9 has a reputation beyond repute AD_ward9 has a reputation beyond repute AD_ward9 has a reputation beyond repute AD_ward9 has a reputation beyond repute AD_ward9 has a reputation beyond repute AD_ward9 has a reputation beyond repute AD_ward9 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via Skype™ to AD_ward9
Re: Prep wrecks for Doria?? Suggestions??

Ted, you seem to be saying the same thing as in my post, namely that traffic over the Doria is vastly less than dives we do around Europe, where a trapeze is fine.

A moving boat can get out of the way of a big ship much faster than one anchored.

The purpose of the surface logistics is to ensure no-one is lost, and people do not deco in a current.

Dave: you are right, on the Seeker I should have put it in the past tense. When it was running, it appeared to be the better of the two main choices.

Thanks for the offer of a boat. Bringing Masters certs is not a problem. We know some really good trawler skippers Any fix for the visa problem?

Cheers

Alex

Quote: (Originally Posted by O.C.Diver) View Original Post
One last time. The Doria is next to (not in) a major shipping lane 100 miles off shore. This is not near coastal. The freighters out there follow the rule of right of weight.The Coast Guard is not out there playing trafic cop! If you are small and moving on their radar (they assume a fishing vessel) in the fog they assume you will get out of their way. When anchored on the Doria we post a radar watch. If a vessel is coming toward us we have time to respond.

If the Doria were located In the shipping lane I would be more receptive to your approach. It's Not, and I see no point in making surface logistics more complicated. I look at it like this: If I need to walk down an interstate hiway, I'm going to do it on the shoulder of the road. It doesn't make sense to me to walk down the lane of the hiway hoping the trucks will steer around me. The shoulder isn't as smooth but it's a lot safer.

Ted
(Offline)
 
Reply With Quote