View Single Post
Old 10th January 2007, 18:12   #34 (permalink)
schford
RBW Founder
 
schford's Avatar

Current Rebreather/s:
Megalodon
Sport Kiss

Other Rebreather/s:
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 3,564
schford has a reputation beyond repute schford has a reputation beyond repute schford has a reputation beyond repute schford has a reputation beyond repute schford has a reputation beyond repute schford has a reputation beyond repute schford has a reputation beyond repute schford has a reputation beyond repute schford has a reputation beyond repute schford has a reputation beyond repute schford has a reputation beyond repute
Re: In response to numerous threads re-speculation v evaluation of facts

Quote: (Originally Posted by CharlieT) View Original Post
Not sure the non- identifying solution is a goer as we are then trying too hard to create a phony scenario.

Everytime anyone clicks on the fatality discussion sub forum up pops a notice warning of the content just as the newsreaders warn viewers about some news stories containing pictures of upsetting scenes.

I think this might be as much as we can or maybe even should be doing.

Too restrictive or too avoiding and we risk driving RBW members to discuss the issues on another diving website which could also be accessed by relatives.

Charlie
I am getting lost here - to be blunt - I am not at all comfortable with discussing a real fatality where we speculate as to the cause etc - no matter where it is on the site.

I am however happy with discussing facts relating to a fatality (caveated with respect for friends and families wishs eg I would not risk a non insurance payout for some ones family who was left behind ).

Also I am happy having an area of the site where people can talk about what if scenarios.
__________________
Bailout and Kit Management account for Murphy's Law

The only bad question is one you did not ask and later wish you had.

Use of RBW is subject to the Rebreather World Terms & Conditions of Use
(Offline)
 
Reply With Quote