View Single Post
Old 5th January 2007, 02:47   #6 (permalink)
Steve
Ladies bring a plate

 
Steve's Avatar

Current Rebreather/s:
Megalodon
Home Build

Other Rebreather/s:
Not Bought Yet
Inspiration Classic
Sport Kiss
Classic Kiss
MK 15.X
Home Build
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Perth - Australia
Posts: 1,100
Steve has a reputation beyond reputeSteve has a reputation beyond reputeSteve has a reputation beyond reputeSteve has a reputation beyond reputeSteve has a reputation beyond reputeSteve has a reputation beyond reputeSteve has a reputation beyond reputeSteve has a reputation beyond reputeSteve has a reputation beyond reputeSteve has a reputation beyond reputeSteve has a reputation beyond repute
Re: dwell-time calculation: axial vs radial

Quote: (Originally Posted by Scott) View Original Post
So for the *same dimension* scrubber, the dwell time is the same.. implying that there is..... no difference in efficiency between the two... at least in this proportion.... correct?
Yes, That is Paul's view on it. Many of us disagree however, and feel he doesn't understand the roles gas path length and tidal movement play and is focused on static gas modelling and as a result the only answer he can come up with is volume is the determining factor. One has to ignore how a rebreather works to arrive at this theory. He isn't wrong as such but rather has opted for an over simplified model that results in a part answer.

For the record, it is well understood that gas moves through a rebreather in steps (breaths) and dwell time is directly related to the size of these steps and the distance from one side of the scrubber to the other. In short (and generally speaking) axials, due to their longer bed length have a longer dwell time. The trade off is a higher WOB.
__________________
WARNING: I contain occasional coarse language, extreme sexual references, nudity, and adult themes, which may offend some people - Usually churchy types.

Last edited by Steve : 5th January 2007 at 02:49.
(Online)
 
Reply With Quote