View Single Post
Old 4th January 2007, 12:19   #51 (permalink)
sven
Blogs Admin / Forum Mod
 
sven's Avatar

Current Rebreather/s:
Inspiration Classic

Other Rebreather/s:
Evolution
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 551
sven is a glorious beacon of light sven is a glorious beacon of light sven is a glorious beacon of light sven is a glorious beacon of light sven is a glorious beacon of light sven is a glorious beacon of light sven is a glorious beacon of light sven is a glorious beacon of light sven is a glorious beacon of light sven is a glorious beacon of light sven is a glorious beacon of light
Send a message via MSN to sven Send a message via Skype™ to sven
Re: Minimising Rebreather Deaths / Fatalities

All,

No reason to get personal here. RBW is a great platform for people to exchange views and information, and learn from each other. In order to make this work, there is Rule number one: Respect each others opinion.

In my opinion, the "horses for courses" argument definitely holds. But we may have different opinions about what that means: RBs only for deep and/or overhead dives vs. RBs to extend your NDL on shallower dives. Stuart's article attempts to help all of us to make our diving safer: deep, overhead, long, shallow, ...

If you would like to discuss the risks of RBs vs. OC, can I suggest you start another thread and keep this one to discuss the article itself, as requested by Stuart earlier. In fact, I'll go and create another thread & poll: Do you think Rebreather diving is inherently more dangerous than OC?
__________________
Regards,
Sven

The Sydney Project website: http://www.sydneyproject.com
My Blog: http://sven.rebreatherworld.com

"Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time to pause and reflect." Mark Twain
(Offline)
 
Reply With Quote