Thread: Diluent selection and the great alpinist v siege debate
View Single Post
Old 31st December 2006, 01:14   #17 (permalink)
Dave Sutton
Diveshop of Horrors
 
Dave Sutton's Avatar

Current Rebreather/s:
Sport Kiss
MK 15.X
rEvo
Other CCR
Azimuth
Home Build

Other Rebreather/s:
Evolution
Megalodon
rEvo
Other CCR
Azimuth
Home Build
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Narragansett, Rhode Island and Hackettstown, New Jersey
Posts: 2,907
Dave Sutton is a splendid one to behold Dave Sutton is a splendid one to behold Dave Sutton is a splendid one to behold Dave Sutton is a splendid one to behold Dave Sutton is a splendid one to behold Dave Sutton is a splendid one to behold Dave Sutton is a splendid one to behold Dave Sutton is a splendid one to behold Dave Sutton is a splendid one to behold Dave Sutton is a splendid one to behold Dave Sutton is a splendid one to behold
Re: Diluent selection and the great alpinist v siege debate
Quote: (Originally Posted by Steve) View Original Post
. I plan my dil to be 0.1 lower than my planned pO2 for the max depth of the dive. Dud sensor info can be cross checked this way.

This is highly sensible and is something I can endorse.

What I cannot endorse is a guy diving at 150 feet on 10% and not seeing that it is less safe than diving 21%.

Agreed that cells are an issue. I pot-test mine to 2.0 PP02 as a routine check.

Dave
__________________
"Silent Diving with No Bubbles and No Politics".... www.nobubblediving.com
(Offline)
  		Reply With Quote