Mike

And from my memory of adjudicating debating at university, a sure way to a low score wass to resort to ad hominem attacks, or merely critique the style, rather than content, of the oppositions argument.

Eloquent assertions without adequate supporting argument should not be considered more valuable than supported, albeit unwield, presentation of a case.

Karl - I suspect that a lot of people agree with you, I know that I did what I could to get away with paying for the minimum number of 'manditory' courses. However, you should realise that most people here have already sunk that money, and have zero chance of getting it back. So we can't be bothered fighting for no personal gain. Yep - most of what you say is right, but I've already been as screwed as I'm going to be, so it's not going to affect me much.

(And for what it's worth, I've done two full MOD 1 courses on two different units, and was forced to pay for the full course the second time around to be able to take delivery of the unit. There was no viable crossover course option)

Mike

__________________
Open ....... Closed
Mind ........ Loop