View Single Post
Old 30th September 2006, 14:34   #8 (permalink)
Skipbreather
Reads fine print (mostly)
 
Skipbreather's Avatar

Current Rebreather/s:
Megalodon
Home Build

Other Rebreather/s:
Not Bought Yet
MK 15.X
Home Build
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Chicago, Illinois, USA
Posts: 613
Skipbreather is a splendid one to behold Skipbreather is a splendid one to behold Skipbreather is a splendid one to behold Skipbreather is a splendid one to behold Skipbreather is a splendid one to behold Skipbreather is a splendid one to behold Skipbreather is a splendid one to behold Skipbreather is a splendid one to behold Skipbreather is a splendid one to behold Skipbreather is a splendid one to behold Skipbreather is a splendid one to behold
Re: Arrrrrggghhh V4Tec BOV

Quote: (Originally Posted by Mark Chase) View Original Post
Neg test passes on everything except the BOV

This is pissing me off. What is it with BOVs and neg tests?

ATB

Mark Chase
Hi Mark-

I’ve built several BOVs with the rotating spool layout and I’ve learned a lot in the process. Here is what is most likely going on:

The EXTERNAL seal- to keep water out of the loop- is the O ring on the spool near whatever serves the function of a face plate/ spool retainer. The gas leaks that cause failure of the neg test occur within the loop- thru the mouthpiece as stated above. A BOV indeed CAN be built to allow a spool type design a decent neg test, but it ain’t easy. I found that the tolerance spool to body has to be in the 0.0005” range- yes 5 ten thousandths of an inch. The final seal is then achieved with lube in the spool to body interface. No O rings involved.

With this tight a clearance my BOV does good +/_ tests, but the spool is not an easy “flick” to twist ala Jetsam. The slight extra effort required to twist a spool vs how other more complex designs function is worth it to me because the internal bore is a LOT larger = lower WOB.

A spool design could be designed gas tight another way as well but would require some pretty exotic milling or molding gear that would allow O ring grooves to be produced on the face of a cylindrical shape. WAAAAAY beyond the capability of my stone age shop…………

Clear as mud, right?

Best,
Ken
(Offline)
 
Reply With Quote