View Single Post
Old 15th September 2006, 19:50   #2 (permalink)
AD_ward9
So much more to learn
 
AD_ward9's Avatar

Current Rebreather/s:
Other CCR

Other Rebreather/s:
Other CCR
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,732
AD_ward9 has a reputation beyond reputeAD_ward9 has a reputation beyond reputeAD_ward9 has a reputation beyond reputeAD_ward9 has a reputation beyond reputeAD_ward9 has a reputation beyond reputeAD_ward9 has a reputation beyond reputeAD_ward9 has a reputation beyond reputeAD_ward9 has a reputation beyond reputeAD_ward9 has a reputation beyond reputeAD_ward9 has a reputation beyond reputeAD_ward9 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via Skype™ to AD_ward9
Re: Minor questions on how to run rebreather simulation scripts

Quote: (Originally Posted by Faceless) View Original Post
I've downloaded MathLab scripts from your site and succesfully run them.
Entire sequence of actions looks througly developed, pretty detailed and consequent. Alex, you and your team once again made a really great and complicate job here.

A minor questions on how to simulate failures during the dive.
I see pretty long list with most of possible breaks/falures, but don't understand how to add/remove them when simulation has started.
How can they be added? Do i need to put simulation on the pause for that ?
Thanks for checking the script. As you are the first who seems to be asking the sort of questions one expects to arise when using a new program, we would like to ensure you get First Class service. If you send me an email with a phone number and time, we can walk you through and compile a Q&A of your questions to help those that follow behind you. Handy being in the same time zone as some of our developers, and same first language.

The short answer is you click on the fault you want to enable it and enter either the depth or the time in which they occur. Click again on them to remove them. I will write something up properly for Monday and post it here.

When some of our own staff started using the CCR model, they had a lot of questions: things that were unexpected, but because the model was in development at the time, we simply tried to fix it to make it more obvious, or gave them a verbal 1:1 answer. We now need to document use of the model better, and by logging carefully your queries as well as answering them properly, I hope we can achieve that.

Cheers,
Alex

Last edited by AD_ward9 : 15th September 2006 at 19:59.
(Offline)
 
Reply With Quote