View Single Post
Old 30th August 2006, 11:58   #64 (permalink)
paulraymaekers
rEvo's daddy

 
paulraymaekers's Avatar

Current Rebreather/s:
rEvo
Other CCR
Home Build

Other Rebreather/s:
rEvo
Other CCR
Home Build
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: belgium
Posts: 1,640
paulraymaekers has a brilliant future paulraymaekers has a brilliant future paulraymaekers has a brilliant future paulraymaekers has a brilliant future paulraymaekers has a brilliant future paulraymaekers has a brilliant future paulraymaekers has a brilliant future paulraymaekers has a brilliant future paulraymaekers has a brilliant future paulraymaekers has a brilliant future paulraymaekers has a brilliant future
Re: Effect of Depth on Scrubber

Quote: (Originally Posted by Steve) View Original Post
Paul,

I can't grasp why you can't see the pointlessness off looking at scrubbers in isolation when talking about dwell time. Your calculations are usless without factoring in the rest of the loop and the diver.
?????? EEEEUUUUUUHHHHHHH ???????

I think in the last posts we were only comparing radial with axial, and keep all the rest unchanged, correct??
the calculations only relate to dwell-time, not to other aspects in the loop, temp, WOB, total loop volume...

I agree perhaps this is the wrong treath, and we better start a separate one on this issue: dwelltime in axial and radial scrubber
??? how to upload files ??

paul
__________________
www.rEvo-rebreathers.com

.... the earth is flat, Elvis is alive, and radial scrubbers give longer dwell time than axials...
(Offline)
 
Reply With Quote