View Single Post
Old 4th August 2006, 06:03   #13 (permalink)
AD_ward9
So much more to learn
 
AD_ward9's Avatar

Current Rebreather/s:
Other CCR

Other Rebreather/s:
Other CCR
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,867
AD_ward9 has a reputation beyond reputeAD_ward9 has a reputation beyond reputeAD_ward9 has a reputation beyond reputeAD_ward9 has a reputation beyond reputeAD_ward9 has a reputation beyond reputeAD_ward9 has a reputation beyond reputeAD_ward9 has a reputation beyond reputeAD_ward9 has a reputation beyond reputeAD_ward9 has a reputation beyond reputeAD_ward9 has a reputation beyond reputeAD_ward9 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via Skype™ to AD_ward9
Re: CO2 production results

Quote: (Originally Posted by diverrob)
I also would like to know how AP determined CO2 production value of 1.6l/min as a bench mark? From what I see in this report 1.6 seems low, I was able to produce 1.6 early on in the test.
APD used 1.6l/min because that is what is specified in EN14143:2003. Section 6.6.2 and Table 4.
The test is for scrubber endurance - keeping up 1.6l/min for the life of the scrubber requires quite a feat: to keep this level of exertion up to several hours.

Alex

Last edited by AD_ward9 : 4th August 2006 at 06:08.
(Offline)
 
Reply With Quote