View Single Post
Old 5th May 2006, 01:52   #25 (permalink)
dteubner
Pedant
 
dteubner's Avatar

Current Rebreather/s:
Sport Kiss
Classic Kiss

Other Rebreather/s:
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 221
dteubner is a glorious beacon of light dteubner is a glorious beacon of light dteubner is a glorious beacon of light dteubner is a glorious beacon of light dteubner is a glorious beacon of light dteubner is a glorious beacon of light dteubner is a glorious beacon of light dteubner is a glorious beacon of light dteubner is a glorious beacon of light dteubner is a glorious beacon of light dteubner is a glorious beacon of light
Re: Very deep dives inflation gas choice - risk of skin bends for Rebreather dives

Quote: (Originally Posted by Peter Steinhoff)
Simon,

First of all I would imagine everyone being in agreement that gas properties do make a difference? Everyone in doubt are free to conduct a dive with a high helium gasmix as a drysuit inflation gas and tell us your empirical findings. Peter
The diffence in conductivity of helium and air is over 6 fold, between air and argon about 1.3 fold. It's hardly the same thing.

It's all about levels of evidence isn't it.

Anecdotal evidence - "this thing that I have spent time and money and effort on makes me feel warmer"

Theoretical evidence - "There is a small difference in a parameter that should make a difference to how warm I feel"

Scientific evidnece - "An extremely well designed and conducted study showed no differrence"

But the scientific evidence is in conflict with the anecdotal evidence - therefore the scientific evidence must be wrong. Flawed study design maybe?

Dave T
(Offline)
 
Reply With Quote