View Single Post
Old 4th May 2006, 14:56   #11 (permalink)
AD_ward9
So much more to learn
 
AD_ward9's Avatar

Current Rebreather/s:
Other CCR

Other Rebreather/s:
Other CCR
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,862
AD_ward9 has a reputation beyond reputeAD_ward9 has a reputation beyond reputeAD_ward9 has a reputation beyond reputeAD_ward9 has a reputation beyond reputeAD_ward9 has a reputation beyond reputeAD_ward9 has a reputation beyond reputeAD_ward9 has a reputation beyond reputeAD_ward9 has a reputation beyond reputeAD_ward9 has a reputation beyond reputeAD_ward9 has a reputation beyond reputeAD_ward9 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via Skype™ to AD_ward9
Re: CNS Calculation and Verification Model

Quote: (Originally Posted by UWSojourner)
Richard Vann's article refers to the PO2 limits in terms of bar. Other published tables refer to ATA. What is the standard? Bar or ATA when refering to 45min at 1.6 (for example)?
Bar and ATA are almost the same: 1 ATA is 1.013 bar (the mean pressure at sea level).

The papers on which the CNS limits are determined, are in ATA, so we use ATA as the reference. The reason ATA is used is because deco algorithms are generally in ATA, because everything is reference to the surface pressure.

Plotted below is the effect of adding the CNS margins being proposed here, in ATA.

Cheers,

Alex
Attached Images
File Type: gif CNS_margins.gif (7.1 KB, 114 views)
(Offline)
 
Reply With Quote