Rebreather World - View Single Post

Underwaterbear · 8th January 2006, 16:06

I'm confused as to where you got this .55 factor.

Back when I studied stoichiometry there was no .55 in the chemical equation you presented. The equation will simply not balance with it in there.

Sorry, but if the rest of your argument follows from this mysterious .55, I think you have a problem.

Cheers
AB

8th January 2006, 16:06	#6 (permalink)
Underwaterbear A Prismer in Megland Current Rebreather/s: Prism Topaz Other Rebreather/s: Join Date: May 2005 Location: Seattle, WA Posts: 192	Re: A new type of sorb I'm confused as to where you got this .55 factor. Back when I studied stoichiometry there was no .55 in the chemical equation you presented. The equation will simply not balance with it in there. Sorry, but if the rest of your argument follows from this mysterious .55, I think you have a problem. Cheers AB
(Offline)