Rebreather World - View Single Post

paulraymaekers · 12th May 2008, 11:56

Quote: (Originally Posted by Devils Advocate)

Hi Paul,
i am waiting for the specs from the company. I do know it is CE approved but don't have all the correct data at the moment, so i wont speculate!!!

Aaron.

Hello Aaron, just for your info then, if you're a bit familiar with CE testing, scrubber performance etc, then you know it is not possible with dual front mounted counterlungs, in 4° celcius at 40m depth, 40l/min RVM, 1.6l/min CO2 injection, to have a 245 minute till 0.5 surface % breaktrough, with 2.8kg sorb ...

unless they would use lithium hydroxide (??) or something similar (don't have the right chem here)

the problem is if such results are published, what other info must be believed or not...

regards
paul

12th May 2008, 11:56	#7 (permalink)
paulraymaekers rEvo's daddy Current Rebreather/s: rEvo Other CCR Home Build Other Rebreather/s: rEvo Other CCR Home Build Join Date: May 2005 Location: belgium Posts: 1,493	Re: voyager v1 tek Quote: (Originally Posted by Devils Advocate) Hi Paul, i am waiting for the specs from the company. I do know it is CE approved but don't have all the correct data at the moment, so i wont speculate!!! Aaron. Hello Aaron, just for your info then, if you're a bit familiar with CE testing, scrubber performance etc, then you know it is not possible with dual front mounted counterlungs, in 4° celcius at 40m depth, 40l/min RVM, 1.6l/min CO2 injection, to have a 245 minute till 0.5 surface % breaktrough, with 2.8kg sorb ... unless they would use lithium hydroxide (??) or something similar (don't have the right chem here) the problem is if such results are published, what other info must be believed or not... regards paul __________________ www.rEvo-rebreathers.com .... the earth is flat, Elvis is alive, and radial scrubbers give longer dwell time than axials... Last edited by paulraymaekers : 12th May 2008 at 11:58.
(Offline)