Rebreather World - View Single Post

Drmike · 28th March 2008, 10:51

Quote: (Originally Posted by jradomski)

the only difference is that one gets connected to a solenoid externally and the other gets connected to a hud..

groan, exactly - so there are component differences

the cables, what they carry and where they go. thats all it could take. It could be one of those unshielded cables.

Quote:

The place the FIELD is pointed at probably could be a variable.. If the field was directed towards teh bottom side of the head, then its directed at the exposed solenoid.. Which wouldn't happen in real life ad shouldn't be comsidered since its not completely assembled since it would be in a metal can.., if it was pointed at a particular handset that one would be exposed to different levels..

There is no indication on how the test was performed, whether each handset was tested individually, whether the whole head was tested at once.. These are alot of variables.. Where the focal point of the test was ect..

And to be fair the tests need to be performed exactly the same way for all units tested.. I understand they only had 1 to work with, but if your going to publish results against a competitor that should be detailed enogh so that they can be analyized for discrepencies..

Its not that hard to figure out test parameters that might influence the outcome..

Isnt that exactly the point of these tests? When my machines were tested for same thing they bent over backwards to try to get it to fail! thats what makes it robustly safe.

its interesting that you admit you have no idea how the tests were done yet you are insinuating that they werent done properly or are invalid.....

I cant wait for ISC to test the explorer computer lol! seeing you jump all over that as well would be fun

28th March 2008, 10:51	#50 (permalink)
Drmike Custom Title Allowed! Current Rebreather/s: MK 15.X Ouroboros Other CCR Home Build Other Rebreather/s: Inspiration Classic Other CCR Home Build Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 3,157	Re: ISC posts test date Quote: (Originally Posted by jradomski) the only difference is that one gets connected to a solenoid externally and the other gets connected to a hud.. groan, exactly - so there are component differences the cables, what they carry and where they go. thats all it could take. It could be one of those unshielded cables. Quote: The place the FIELD is pointed at probably could be a variable.. If the field was directed towards teh bottom side of the head, then its directed at the exposed solenoid.. Which wouldn't happen in real life ad shouldn't be comsidered since its not completely assembled since it would be in a metal can.., if it was pointed at a particular handset that one would be exposed to different levels.. There is no indication on how the test was performed, whether each handset was tested individually, whether the whole head was tested at once.. These are alot of variables.. Where the focal point of the test was ect.. And to be fair the tests need to be performed exactly the same way for all units tested.. I understand they only had 1 to work with, but if your going to publish results against a competitor that should be detailed enogh so that they can be analyized for discrepencies.. Its not that hard to figure out test parameters that might influence the outcome.. Isnt that exactly the point of these tests? When my machines were tested for same thing they bent over backwards to try to get it to fail! thats what makes it robustly safe. its interesting that you admit you have no idea how the tests were done yet you are insinuating that they werent done properly or are invalid..... I cant wait for ISC to test the explorer computer lol! seeing you jump all over that as well would be fun __________________ Cave diving is a sport Wreck diving is a sport Diving in general is a sport 'Rebreather diving' is not a sport its the delusional obsession with a highly dangerous and often inappropriate piece of equipment Last edited by Drmike : 28th March 2008 at 10:55.
(Offline)