Rebreather World - View Single Post

paulraymaekers · 25th March 2008, 08:24

Quote: (Originally Posted by Mark Chase)

Isnt the IP deturmined by the 02 usage rate of the diver?

Has it got a fixed oraface or does it have a needle valve?

If its a fixed oraface like the KISS then you will need at least 11 bar to go to 100m. Beyound that you will need to alter the oraface size and customise the first stage spring to give a much higher IP

I am reasnobly certain the CE mark has absolutly nothing to do with its abuility to go to X depth, so id ignore that issue.

ATB

Mark

there's only one way to compare it with other scrubbers:

show me the graph of the CO2 output during the CE test:

1.6l/min CO2, 40l/min RVM, 40m depth, at 4° celcius: how long does it take to break trough?

paul

25th March 2008, 08:24	#6 (permalink)
paulraymaekers rEvo's daddy Current Rebreather/s: rEvo Other CCR Home Build Other Rebreather/s: rEvo Other CCR Home Build Join Date: May 2005 Location: belgium Posts: 1,432	Re: Submatix Quote: (Originally Posted by Mark Chase) Isnt the IP deturmined by the 02 usage rate of the diver? Has it got a fixed oraface or does it have a needle valve? If its a fixed oraface like the KISS then you will need at least 11 bar to go to 100m. Beyound that you will need to alter the oraface size and customise the first stage spring to give a much higher IP I am reasnobly certain the CE mark has absolutly nothing to do with its abuility to go to X depth, so id ignore that issue. ATB Mark there's only one way to compare it with other scrubbers: show me the graph of the CO2 output during the CE test: 1.6l/min CO2, 40l/min RVM, 40m depth, at 4° celcius: how long does it take to break trough? paul __________________ www.rEvo-rebreathers.com .... the earth is flat, Elvis is alive, and radial scrubbers give longer dwell time than axials...
(Online)