View Single Post
Old 19th March 2008, 05:06   #3 (permalink)
jradomski
Moderator

 
jradomski's Avatar

Current Rebreather/s:
Inspiration Classic
Sport Kiss
Optima
rEvo
Other CCR
Home Build

Other Rebreather/s:
Inspiration Vision
Evolution
Megalodon
Classic Kiss
rEvo
Other CCR
Home Build
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: "Da" Bronx
Posts: 3,001
jradomski has a reputation beyond reputejradomski has a reputation beyond reputejradomski has a reputation beyond reputejradomski has a reputation beyond reputejradomski has a reputation beyond reputejradomski has a reputation beyond reputejradomski has a reputation beyond reputejradomski has a reputation beyond reputejradomski has a reputation beyond reputejradomski has a reputation beyond reputejradomski has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Would an integrated O2 tank pressure monitor be safer?

Quote: (Originally Posted by ScubaDadMiami) View Original Post
I think that this is a good idea for not only O2 but also for diluent. It might not create a new failure point since it could replace the analog gauges that not only connect into the first stage (failure point one) but also have o-ring swivels (failure point two) and then connect into the SPG (failure point three).

Regarding the alarm, it would be important to make such a device so that the user would know right away which alarm was sounding. Too many alarms that go off in a similar fashion can be confusing and cause the diver to spend time trying to figure out what is going on rather than reacting.
this would not be a problem for oxgen asside from cost.. for diluent unless you go to an expensive capacitive sensor you will have issues with helium screwing up the pressure readings after a period of time..
__________________
Joe Radomski
CCR Trimix Instructor Trainer
ANDI Instructor Trainer Director #10

All posts are personal opinions and DO NOT reflect any affiliated agency unless specifically stated.
(Offline)
 
Reply With Quote