View Single Post
Old 3rd March 2008, 15:10   #23 (permalink)
NEDIVER
Sic Semper Tyrannis
 
NEDIVER's Avatar

Current Rebreather/s:
Evolution

Other Rebreather/s:
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Nashua, NH
Posts: 121
NEDIVER is on a distinguished roadNEDIVER is on a distinguished road
Re: Canon 40D housing

Quote: (Originally Posted by grunzster) View Original Post
Where are you getting this info from? I highly doubt this is true.

A full size sensor potentially = sharper image, less noise, etc. etc., but 10MP = 10MP = 10MP. If it's the same file format file, same type of image, exposure, colors, etc. and the same resolution, it should be relatively the same size.
you are absolutely correct, Sensor size contributes to may things, especially noise. The more densely packed the megapixel race pushes sensors, the more noise manufacturers must deal with the issue. Most of your 10mp non-DSLR no have 400 ISO on up that are somewhat useable to downright mushy because of noise reduction. While DSLR maybe have 10mp, the chip is physically larger, thus the density is lower. DSLR have 3 chip sizes now, all of which are much larger than point and shoot type sensors.

It is this increase in "quality" that allows the camera to produce a larger file (more detail). For example there are three settings on the Canon 40D that record the image at 10.1 mega pixels. they are Large/Fine, Large/Normal (both JPEG), and RAW. All three settings have different file sizes. They are 3.5MB, 1.8MB and 12.4MB's, respectively. This data comes directly from the instruction manual.

I apologize if I wasn't clear in what I was saying before. I hope I did a better job this time.

Tom
__________________
-Tom-

"slow is smooth, and smooth is fast" TM
"Insanity is repeating the same thing over and over again, expecting different results" Albert Einstein
(Offline)
 
Reply With Quote