View Single Post
Old 27th February 2008, 17:41   #30 (permalink)
Ilikerisk
New Member
 
Ilikerisk's Avatar

Current Rebreather/s:
Not Bought Yet

Other Rebreather/s:
Not Bought Yet
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New York
Posts: 48
Ilikerisk will become famous soon enoughIlikerisk will become famous soon enoughIlikerisk will become famous soon enough
Re: Sentinel off-board gas functionality

Quote: (Originally Posted by iain-hsm) View Original Post
I like Risk.
Sorry but no one shot out "You Suck etc, etc" and would refer you to the second paragraph of my first post number 12.
With respect it has been the answers to my questions that have been (as you say above) not consistant with the decorum etc etc. iain
It seems to me that both sides have been inconsistent with decorum etc., but that you started it.

Regardless of who started it, what's important is to refocus the discussion where it can be productive. I encourage again: Please post the military's rejection document so we can discuss the actual reasons for the rejection with particularity and logic.

I accept that CCRB offers a military version of the sentinel and that no-one's bought it yet -- but I have no idea of how to interpret that information, and the "debate" taking place as to whether the military generally makes good or poor procurement decisions is not helpful.
(Offline)
 
Reply With Quote