Rebreather World - View Single Post - Sentinel off-board gas functionality

iain-hsm · 26th February 2008, 18:55

Quote: (Originally Posted by Nad)

Ridiculous? Do you have better ideas on how to build a BOV or maybe you're aware of some information that the comunity don't know? So please you can share with us.

Or maybe you just vented out the first thing you had in mind?

Nad

I suggest that if a potential customer thinks its too big then in some quarters “its too big”

My response would be to explain the geometry, the design and WOB issues of the DMM. But in pure mechanical size it is still bigger than other alternatives.

Much easier than the other route, to explain why after this product was originally designed for a Royal Navy project, after trials it was rejected.
Because of size, weight, design or capability? All legitimate reasons for rejection.
Or for being ugly?

26th February 2008, 18:55	#12 (permalink)
iain-hsm Custom Title Allowed! Current Rebreather/s: MK 15.X Other CCR Other SCR Other Rebreather/s: Other CCR Other SCR Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Loughborough England uk Posts: 347	Re: Sentinel off-board gas functionality Quote: (Originally Posted by Nad) Ridiculous? Do you have better ideas on how to build a BOV or maybe you're aware of some information that the comunity don't know? So please you can share with us. Or maybe you just vented out the first thing you had in mind? Nad I suggest that if a potential customer thinks its too big then in some quarters “its too big” My response would be to explain the geometry, the design and WOB issues of the DMM. But in pure mechanical size it is still bigger than other alternatives. Much easier than the other route, to explain why after this product was originally designed for a Royal Navy project, after trials it was rejected. Because of size, weight, design or capability? All legitimate reasons for rejection. Or for being ugly?
(Offline)