Rebreather World - View Single Post

Gilles · 23rd January 2008, 10:11

Quote: (Originally Posted by PacketSniffer)

... So, for now, I love the APECS 2.x for it's simplicity and ruggedness. Deco is handled by a completely separate computer (Liquivision X1). For me, it's the perfect marriage. Going this route makes even more sense for me because it doesn't tie the decompression to just one rebreather during a dive.

APECS 3.0? Not interested.

Quote: (Originally Posted by netmage)

Resilliancy, ruggedness, and redundancy through modularity... I don't like being locked into an integrated vertical solution.

Quote: (Originally Posted by Skipbreather)

I have to echo Richard’s sentiments. I’m eminently satisfied w/ my APECS 2.x electronics. They have a simple job to do and they’ve done it, rock solid, for over 2 years now. I truly value the absolute separation of deco from ppO2 control, both for reliability and upgrade reasons.

Quote: (Originally Posted by mverick)

I'm not gonna shoot the horse before it comes to the race. But, I'm in with the non computor crowd.

This is fairly amazing, and quite influencing to me trying to determine the best option on the way forward. My well used, and battered

Meg needs a workover

http://www.rebreatherworld.com/offic...06-ugrade.html

Hmm maybe a simple fix + an X1 (or a Shearwater) is in the cards after all

.

23rd January 2008, 10:11	#24 (permalink)
Gilles Worship the feminine Current Rebreather/s: Megalodon Other Rebreather/s: Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Den Haag (Netherlands) Posts: 762	Re: APECS 3.0 almost here? Quote: (Originally Posted by PacketSniffer) ... So, for now, I love the APECS 2.x for it's simplicity and ruggedness. Deco is handled by a completely separate computer (Liquivision X1). For me, it's the perfect marriage. Going this route makes even more sense for me because it doesn't tie the decompression to just one rebreather during a dive. APECS 3.0? Not interested. Quote: (Originally Posted by netmage) Resilliancy, ruggedness, and redundancy through modularity... I don't like being locked into an integrated vertical solution. Quote: (Originally Posted by Skipbreather) I have to echo Richard’s sentiments. I’m eminently satisfied w/ my APECS 2.x electronics. They have a simple job to do and they’ve done it, rock solid, for over 2 years now. I truly value the absolute separation of deco from ppO2 control, both for reliability and upgrade reasons. Quote: (Originally Posted by mverick) I'm not gonna shoot the horse before it comes to the race. But, I'm in with the non computor crowd. This is fairly amazing, and quite influencing to me trying to determine the best option on the way forward. My well used, and battered Meg needs a workover http://www.rebreatherworld.com/offic...06-ugrade.html Hmm maybe a simple fix + an X1 (or a Shearwater) is in the cards after all. __________________ Gilles http://www.dirrebreather.com
(Offline)