View Single Post
Old 13th January 2008, 21:12   #30 (permalink)
gerstl_ossi
RBW Member
 
gerstl_ossi's Avatar

Current Rebreather/s:
RB80 / Clone
Home Build

Other Rebreather/s:
Not Bought Yet
RB80 / Clone
Home Build
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Italy
Posts: 345
gerstl_ossi is a splendid one to behold gerstl_ossi is a splendid one to behold gerstl_ossi is a splendid one to behold gerstl_ossi is a splendid one to behold gerstl_ossi is a splendid one to behold gerstl_ossi is a splendid one to behold gerstl_ossi is a splendid one to behold gerstl_ossi is a splendid one to behold gerstl_ossi is a splendid one to behold gerstl_ossi is a splendid one to behold gerstl_ossi is a splendid one to behold
Re: mCCR or eCCR for video filming

For filming I prefer eCCR. Especially in shallow water it gives more security. A normal filming scenario for example ......red see, deep 18 meter, visibility more than 25 meter. You see a big shark, manta ore turtle 20 meter from you. There is a little current, not to much, but with the rebreather, the video-light, the video-camera you have just to work a bit harder to come closer. You are at 10 meters from this nice shoot, you start the video-light, correct the angle of them, because before you made a macro shoot to a small fish, you correct the video-camera settings, focus, w-balance.... and start it. You come closer 7 meter, but the fish or turtle moves from 20 to 15, 12, 10, you are concentrated to the viewfinder and the buoyancy .... only a bit closer for the perfect shoot, olny some more seconds than....uuuuuups forgot to check the PPO2 on the mCCR. That's only a example, but I'm sure eCCR is better for the video freaks. mCCR works fine too, with a hud and for deep wracks, caves - filming.

Friendly Oswald

Last edited by gerstl_ossi : 13th January 2008 at 22:45.
(Offline)
 
Reply With Quote