View Single Post
Old 1st January 2008, 20:25   #10 (permalink)
AD_ward9
So much more to learn
 
AD_ward9's Avatar

Current Rebreather/s:
Other CCR

Other Rebreather/s:
Other CCR
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,726
AD_ward9 has a reputation beyond reputeAD_ward9 has a reputation beyond reputeAD_ward9 has a reputation beyond reputeAD_ward9 has a reputation beyond reputeAD_ward9 has a reputation beyond reputeAD_ward9 has a reputation beyond reputeAD_ward9 has a reputation beyond reputeAD_ward9 has a reputation beyond reputeAD_ward9 has a reputation beyond reputeAD_ward9 has a reputation beyond reputeAD_ward9 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via Skype™ to AD_ward9
Re: using LiMn batteries

Update.

http://www.valence.com/assets/pdf/ex...nal_report.pdf shows the relative safety of the different battery types. We have put the Valence cells into the DL designed products using larger batteries. Drawbacks are larger size (almost double), for a given output, and unusual charging circuitry.

Looks like Lithium Phosphate (e.g. the Valence Saphion), are still the most appropriate for rebreather use or suit heating.

Li-Mn can explode, from a test we did with high PPO2: the case ruptures and the chemicals insides burn. The Li-Co cells are even more exciting: little bombs in a high O2 environment.

The lithium ion cell risks are real enough for airlines to limit the size of cell you can take on. A large cell in a torch battery could blow a hole through the airframe.

The only safe cells right now seem to the Valence cells.

Alex

Last edited by AD_ward9 : 1st January 2008 at 20:34.
(Offline)
 
Reply With Quote