View Single Post
Old 15th December 2007, 02:10   #6 (permalink)
diverklondike
Moderator


 
diverklondike's Avatar

Current Rebreather/s:
Inspiration Classic
Other CCR

Other Rebreather/s:
Inspiration Classic
Other CCR
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Delaware, USA
Posts: 1,552
diverklondike has much to be proud ofdiverklondike has much to be proud ofdiverklondike has much to be proud ofdiverklondike has much to be proud ofdiverklondike has much to be proud ofdiverklondike has much to be proud ofdiverklondike has much to be proud ofdiverklondike has much to be proud ofdiverklondike has much to be proud ofdiverklondike has much to be proud ofdiverklondike has much to be proud of
Re: Pentagon Appropriations for scrubber research

Quote: (Originally Posted by lakelanddiver1978) View Original Post
I guess my point was that I assumed that scrubber technology was pretty much played out, at least at the military leve. 1.6 million seems like a lot of money for R&D on basic scrubber techology, unless something new is in the pipeline.

Justin
The recreational scuba industry is just one of many industries that has needs for C02 scrubber technology. A simple review of the Micropore website sheds some light on this. Many of these applications have much tighter tolerances in weight/performance and related efficiencies.

M
(Online)
 
Reply With Quote