Thread: Cis Lunar Mk 6
View Single Post
Old 11th November 2007, 19:38   #170 (permalink)
najones
New Member
 
najones's Avatar

Current Rebreather/s:
Not Bought Yet

Other Rebreather/s:
Not Bought Yet
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: maryland
Posts: 17
najones will become famous soon enough najones will become famous soon enough najones will become famous soon enough najones will become famous soon enough
Re: Cis Lunar Mk 6

Quote: (Originally Posted by silent running) View Original Post
This is very interesting Nigel, but I'm a bit confused about what the reference is at any given point during the dive. If it's true that sensors can and do need frequent calibraion, somtimes even during the dive, how then can the PO2 be trusted for depth sensor cal/reference? Thanks, -Andy
First PO2 sensors do not need frequent calibration per se. What they do need is frequent checking as their failure modes can be insidious and catastrophic.

To answer your Question:

PO2 = FO2 * absolute_pressure

absolute_pressure ~= (1 + depth/10) with depth in meters

Thus:
FO2 = PO2 * (1 + depth/10)

If any two of these three variables are known, then the third may be validated. Thus in the normal case, FO2 is known and depth is assumed to be accurate, thus PO2 can be computed and compared to what the PO2 sensors are reading.

Conversely, if the PO2 sensors were known to be extremely reliable (which may be the case one day when there is a breakthrough in PO2 sensor technology), then we may rearrange the equation to give us:
(1 + depth/10) = FO2/PO2
(10 + depth) = 10 * FO2 / PO2

depth = (10 * FO2 / PO2) - 10;

In which case, we could use this equation to validate the depth sensor.

I hope this helps.
(Offline)
 
Reply With Quote