View Single Post
Old 15th October 2007, 22:53   #44 (permalink)
Dsix36
Going Down?
 
Dsix36's Avatar

Current Rebreather/s:
Optima

Other Rebreather/s:
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Deerfield Beach, Florida
Posts: 1,054
Dsix36 is a name known to allDsix36 is a name known to allDsix36 is a name known to allDsix36 is a name known to allDsix36 is a name known to allDsix36 is a name known to allDsix36 is a name known to allDsix36 is a name known to allDsix36 is a name known to allDsix36 is a name known to allDsix36 is a name known to all
Send a message via AIM to Dsix36 Send a message via MSN to Dsix36 Send a message via Yahoo to Dsix36
Re: Rebreather Comparison Chart

Quote: (Originally Posted by jradomski) View Original Post
I don't think they set out to make the optima look bad, they set out to test it using similair parameters that CE units are tested at.. The test data Kevin released is fairly close to what I have heard in the past..

The test shows that the extendair does not do well at high flow rates with high co2 production..

If you are comparing scrubbers the worse case is a good starting point, high flow rates quickly show flaws in a scrubber.. Anyone can choose test parameters that make their units look good..

We all knew ahead of time that the sport kiss did not do well at high flow rates due to its shape but had reasonable performance when flow rates were kept in usual dive parameters.. The all out tests have their uses, since it is possible to reeach these flow rates for short periods of time.. Scrubbers with longer beds will do better at high flow rates but will usually also have a higher wob (unless the diameter is increased as well)
That makes sense, Thanks for the reply.
__________________
THE MORE THAT I LEARN, THE MORE THAT I STILL NEED TO LEARN!!!!!!
(Offline)
 
Reply With Quote