**** given that there is no description of how the data was measured on the poster with the data presented then that data is meaningless and just manufacturer hype.
rachel
******
Quote: (Originally Posted by
schford)
It was explained to me - that if the CO2 rate was lowered than the other scrubbers would do proportionally better too. So again the cartridge would be last? Is this wrong (I understand the basic theory behind it all but dont profess to be an epxert or have played with test equipment)?
I think what Kevin has done here is a good start but exactly how balanced this is remains to be seen until all of the details on the testing have been shown. (Obviously hard to do based on what information we have been given to this point.) For example we see Paul's comment on the rEvo numbers as they apply to the ammount of scrubber that's used and Alex's on what assumptions the Optima was designed for etc... I am also not personally convinced that this information scales in a linear fashion when you change things like C02 flow, temperature depth etc... With that I think it's premature to say that this one set of graphs makes this CCR better than another... Once we fully understand the "how and why's" around the testing this may change but personally I am not there yet....
Thanks
Mark