Rebreather World - View Single Post

paulraymaekers · 15th October 2007, 10:33

Quote: (Originally Posted by AD_ward9)

There are some anomalies though, which are worthy of discussion.

and this one:

rEvo 142 minutes ouroborus 154 minutes

efficiency: rEvo BETTER than ouroborus: meaning the rEvo had LESS sorb in the unit then the ouroborus ... why??

the rEvo can take more kg sorb in the scrubber (2.8kg sofno fine grade) then the boris, so why was it not completely filled, according to manufacturing specs?

according to the data, with a correct filled canister, the rEvo would have given minimum 162 minutes (with 2.8kg stead of 2.45 kg)

paul

(difficult to hide that he's a bit... grrr)

15th October 2007, 10:33	#28 (permalink)
paulraymaekers rEvo's daddy Current Rebreather/s: rEvo Other CCR Home Build Other Rebreather/s: rEvo Other CCR Home Build Join Date: May 2005 Location: belgium Posts: 1,494	Re: Rebreather Comparison Chart Quote: (Originally Posted by AD_ward9) There are some anomalies though, which are worthy of discussion. and this one: rEvo 142 minutes ouroborus 154 minutes efficiency: rEvo BETTER than ouroborus: meaning the rEvo had LESS sorb in the unit then the ouroborus ... why?? the rEvo can take more kg sorb in the scrubber (2.8kg sofno fine grade) then the boris, so why was it not completely filled, according to manufacturing specs? according to the data, with a correct filled canister, the rEvo would have given minimum 162 minutes (with 2.8kg stead of 2.45 kg) paul (difficult to hide that he's a bit... grrr) __________________ www.rEvo-rebreathers.com .... the earth is flat, Elvis is alive, and radial scrubbers give longer dwell time than axials... Last edited by paulraymaekers : 15th October 2007 at 10:35.
(Online)