View Single Post
Old 15th October 2007, 10:19   #20 (permalink)
paulraymaekers
rEvo's daddy

 
paulraymaekers's Avatar

Current Rebreather/s:
rEvo
Other CCR
Home Build

Other Rebreather/s:
rEvo
Other CCR
Home Build
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: belgium
Posts: 1,640
paulraymaekers has a brilliant future paulraymaekers has a brilliant future paulraymaekers has a brilliant future paulraymaekers has a brilliant future paulraymaekers has a brilliant future paulraymaekers has a brilliant future paulraymaekers has a brilliant future paulraymaekers has a brilliant future paulraymaekers has a brilliant future paulraymaekers has a brilliant future paulraymaekers has a brilliant future
Re: Rebreather Comparison Chart

Quote: (Originally Posted by caveseeker7) View Original Post
Actually, I'm not even sure if the position did indeed made such a big difference, as the test was for breathing resistance.
I'll try and find out how the testing was done.
Hi Stephan, it makes the most possible difference: imagine that it's dynamic testing: breathing cycles push-pull though the unit, at an immence flow (75l/min)

in vertical position, on every cycle when you exhale, and when you did not optimise your counterlung volume, you have to push a volume of gas 50cm lower than your mouth, or 30cm lower then the center of your lungs!!!

and you mesure the energy (joules) that is needed to transport the gas trough the system....

paul
__________________
www.rEvo-rebreathers.com

.... the earth is flat, Elvis is alive, and radial scrubbers give longer dwell time than axials...
(Offline)
 
Reply With Quote