Quote: (Originally Posted by
jtoorish)

Hopefully if and when other Rebreather manufacturers release their testing data, it will be to the same standards so we will have a good baseline of comparison --essentially comparing all apples as has been mentioned. I suspect that's the reason the testing data is not as 'real world."
I am impressed with KISS that they undertook to have their units tested and they released the data.
Jeff
Hello Jeff, thanks for posting the tests, good to see other manufacturers going to the trouble/expense of independent testing.
I think that a good starting point for an apples to apples comparision is to look at how much CO2 it absorbs before reaching say a .5% SEV or surface equivilant value, the threshold used in USN testing. Going by 1.6lpm for 157 minutes in the CK test, we get 251.2 lts of CO2 absorbtion before the 50 milibar threshold. Based on my frequently faulty math, I think 50 milibar is almost the same as .5% at 1 ata, right? -Andy