View Single Post
Old 11th October 2007, 16:39   #6 (permalink)
lizardland
Yak
 
lizardland's Avatar

Current Rebreather/s:
MK 15.X
Home Build

Other Rebreather/s:
Classic Kiss
Home Build
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: North...
Posts: 1,303
lizardland has a reputation beyond reputelizardland has a reputation beyond reputelizardland has a reputation beyond reputelizardland has a reputation beyond reputelizardland has a reputation beyond reputelizardland has a reputation beyond reputelizardland has a reputation beyond reputelizardland has a reputation beyond reputelizardland has a reputation beyond reputelizardland has a reputation beyond reputelizardland has a reputation beyond repute
Re: KISS Announces Results of Scrubber Duration Testing

I must admit I'm a bit confused as well, the figures are a bit meaningless. The only thing it proves is that a diver under those conditions would have a good chance of surviving 2h37m. For practical diving it's a bit useless. Without knowing how those criteria can be traded off and interpolated e.g. if I go deeper in warmer water than the tests, how do I guesstimate what I can do in the shallows?

It's not a criticism of the test specifically, well done Jetsam for releasing it but without the means of applying that in the real world then it isn't really doing us any good. And, as I said, that's nothing to do with Jetsam, it's just the current state of our knowledge.

I'll keep sticking to my 3hr(ish) limit.
__________________
Can you imagine drifting along in the sea with your mouth open and a load of f***ing plankton going in? You'd like it, would you?

www.westons-cider.co.uk

Azerbaijani Association of Technical Divers Publicity Officer and Goat Wrangler
(Offline)
 
Reply With Quote