View Single Post
Old 16th July 2007, 20:45   #16 (permalink)
DanDunfee
Custom Title Allowed!


 
DanDunfee's Avatar

Current Rebreather/s:
Other CCR
Other SCR
Home Build

Other Rebreather/s:
Not Bought Yet
Other CCR
Other SCR
Home Build
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 204
DanDunfee is just really niceDanDunfee is just really niceDanDunfee is just really niceDanDunfee is just really niceDanDunfee is just really niceDanDunfee is just really niceDanDunfee is just really niceDanDunfee is just really niceDanDunfee is just really nice
Re: Excessive counterlung volume on my MEG

I think that you'll find that knowing a good, representative TV for yourself is a much more useful number than FVC for most of the calculations you'll make.

I, for one, believe that too many RBs have too large total CL volumes. This occurs for various reasons, including some modern, commercial, manufacturers designing it that way to minimize WOB, to squeak by the CE certification requirements or for marketing purposes. .

I believe that excessive CL volumes have certain penalties, including:
* Carrying excessive weight to offset the excessive buoyancy
* Greater absolute CL volume changes with depth changes, and more gas used
or dumped adjusting for the volume and buoyancy changes. .
* More trim problems in some cases.

Most, more modern, combat UBA systems use total CL free volumes in the 5-8 l range whether they use Back-mounted, OTS, or Chest-Pack CLs. . I've recently designed a single, chest-pack CL for a personal rig, which is a heavily modded RG-UF/M, and is intended to have a CL free volume of ~ 6 l.
__________________
There are 'Bold' divers and old divers, but NO old, ' Bold ' divers

Last edited by DanDunfee : 16th July 2007 at 21:07.
(Offline)
 
Reply With Quote