Thread: Extendair better for flood recovery?
View Single Post
Old 23rd April 2007, 11:11   #6 (permalink)
diverklondike
Just one of the Peasants

 
diverklondike's Avatar

Current Rebreather/s:
Inspiration Classic
Other CCR

Other Rebreather/s:
Inspiration Classic
Other CCR
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Delaware, USA
Posts: 1,609
diverklondike has much to be proud ofdiverklondike has much to be proud ofdiverklondike has much to be proud ofdiverklondike has much to be proud ofdiverklondike has much to be proud ofdiverklondike has much to be proud ofdiverklondike has much to be proud ofdiverklondike has much to be proud ofdiverklondike has much to be proud ofdiverklondike has much to be proud ofdiverklondike has much to be proud of
Re: Extendair better for flood recovery?
Couple quick items...

1) Micropore has several patents on their process because of the "benifits of their technology" matrix etc... Highlevel information can be found on their website...

ExtendAir



2) From personal experiance I can state that I would much rather be dealing with a flooded loop with a Micropore Cartridge over a scrubber full of sorb. Alex's last comments pretty much says it all...


Dive Safe.... Mark
Last edited by diverklondike : 23rd April 2007 at 11:13.
(Online)
  		Reply With Quote