View Single Post
Old 23rd April 2007, 10:14   #5 (permalink)
decoweenie
Crash Test Dummy
 
decoweenie's Avatar

Current Rebreather/s:
Other CCR

Other Rebreather/s:
Other CCR
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cairo
Posts: 5,510
decoweenie has a reputation beyond reputedecoweenie has a reputation beyond reputedecoweenie has a reputation beyond reputedecoweenie has a reputation beyond reputedecoweenie has a reputation beyond reputedecoweenie has a reputation beyond reputedecoweenie has a reputation beyond reputedecoweenie has a reputation beyond reputedecoweenie has a reputation beyond reputedecoweenie has a reputation beyond reputedecoweenie has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Extendair better for flood recovery?

Quote: (Originally Posted by AD_ward9) View Original Post
The reason is the CaOH is very well fixed in the plastic matrix in the EAC...
How much does this plastic matrix inhibit the interaction between the gas and the sorb material ?

One would think that by having a plastic material surrounding the sorb, that would happen. Thus the reason why it takes a longer period of time for water to react with the sorb.

If it does inhibit the interaction, then should it be a less efficient ?
__________________
"...after a while you get bored offering advice to a bull that like to keep butting the fence with its head rather than walking through the open gate..."

- Rebreather World PM
(Offline)
 
Reply With Quote