Quote: (Originally Posted by
MattW)

To be honest, for me it's more to do with the principle than being out of pocket.
Matt,
I understand what you are saying, and can't believe one day that I would act as a defender for Ron...

but as I understood, the reason of 9/90 went under wasn't entirely Ron's fault (as mentioned by a previous post from someone else).
And he had done everything within reason to make up and complete the transaction (i.e. magazine subscription) when contacted.
So
IMHO, he kept up his end principly... but yes, he could be a little more pro-active in getting the replacement issues to the subscribers, but he is not ducking the issue when contacted.
And yes, I spent more time/effort to contact Ron out of principle as well since the money was negligible.